Oh, they were selling chastity belts.
I missed that in the legal holdings.
Alternatively, they were selling things that could be a public human hazard in house— not chastity belts.
You’re the one that implied people should cover their privates with ‘helmets’ to protect them from ‘penetration’ with nonstandard ‘item’s.
Because ‘ealth and safety!’
Or something.
If you’re going to argue ‘implements’ and ‘health and safety’ vis a vis ‘emergency room visits’ and the state’s ability to limit those ‘implements’ in the name of public health, do NOT be surprised when the next ‘implements’ that might cause ‘emergency room visits’ they regulate are your very own firearms.
Oh yeah.
And having a really good friend who worked as a real live ER doc for 15 years (and keeps us highly entertained with stories of dumba@@es) you do NOT want to go to the produce department of any grocery store. You’d run out of lawsuits before you ran out of things there you’d want to outlaw.