Posted on 04/12/2016 9:22:49 AM PDT by henkster
At the end of the day, politics corrupts laws.
It is the person who is hired to prosecute who should do so with honor and not be concerned with the rest of it.
If she sails, what next? No controlling legal authority, right?
If she is not prosecuted, we are no longer a country of laws.
I would be more than pleased if charges are brought. As for prosecution, cross that bridge when you get there.
Thanks for the perspective, but I have a question with a different slant to it:
“Should HRC ever get a security clearance again?”
As POTUS, she would need one...even presidential candidates are briefed on secret matters, after the conventions.
But, she is a known security threat, who obviously cannot be trusted with secret information.
Denying her a clearance shouldn’t take a trial, should it? Isn’t it a matter of one brave soul rejecting her, at the administrative level? If this were to happen, even temporarily while the Clinton Crime syndicate did a work around, it would at least shine light on what she has done.
Hillary’s prison nickname is going to be “Spike”.
"Henk, you're a lawyer?" "Say it ain't so!"
Without knowing what the material was that was mishandled, the jury would be subject to a barrage of spin regarding the real value of the information and how it became classified in the first place. Someone with access to TS/SCI material is not going to be able to tell the jury what was mishandled.
I also don’t believe the sitting democrat president would indict his heir apparent. I posted this from the perspective of fhe problems the proesection would face it did happen.
While it’s fun to fantasize about the “coulda shoulda” scenarios, I have finally come to the conclusion that she will get a pass on this, like everything else, and that she will be the nominee and mostly the next president. Her husband’s multiple rapes and sexual assaults will also be ignored.
I only get depressed reading these endless wishful thinking posts and will try not to do so anymore.
Many thanks for your thoughts on this issue. Unfortunately I think you’re right. It’s an unfortunate situation, as a country, that we find ourselves in. We are no longer a country of laws but of men.
The governmnt has a dilemma. Do you file on all the crimes and overcomplicate the case or file on something simple, and after all the inveztigation the media says “that’s all you got?”
Justice is a commodity. You can have as much as you can afford.
Hitlary’s guilty and we all know it, getting her to trial is the biggest hurdle. And just think, we used to hang horse thieves. It’s amazing what money will buy you out of. Simply, there is no justice.
She MUST be charged and indicted. Before the election. It will be a blow to her campaign and take the attention off of her opponent.
Yes, I’m a lawyer. Keep in mind that it’s only 99% of the lawyers that give the rest of us a bad name.
Heh, just kidding anyway, have a Great Day!
There has been. People are mad as hell and they are not going to take it any more.
I don't do criminal work. Where would a prosecution be brought? If it would be DC, you might as well save the resources and fuggetaboutit.
Venue might depend on whether Hillary has co-conspirators indicted with her. If so, you could have venue in D. C. where the conspiracy was hatched. Or you could have venue in New York where the server was located. Which would be just as bad.
I doubt it will be in the Southern District of Indiana, and even less likely that I get selected as Juror #7.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.