Phyllis directly says they are not acting according to bylaws, but are holding illegal meetings, placing their own people in key positions illegally, attempting to purge non-Cruzers from group, and seize control of bank accounts.
If she cited which by laws they are not acting by, I would be better able to follow her argument. Is it a seven-member board with all members present and participating for the first 11 minutes of the conference call until Phyllis is muted, or is it a 13 member board with 7 members initially present, or is it a 25 member board? How is quorum defined?
It is not sufficient for a disgruntled board member, even if the founder, (and I respect Schlafly greatly), to make a charge to make the charge true.
I, at least, don’t have enough information to conclude anything, with the possible exception of concluding that many people jump to conclusions on the basis of insufficient information.
Phyllis Schlafly was once a conservative hero.
But her decision to endorse an opportunistic, narcissistic whiner like Trump shows that she has grown dotty.
The Eagle Forum board is right in trying to get the train back on track.
Trump is a losing, incompetent loser, and a bad one at that.