Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe; wagglebee

They all support partial birth abortion, PM, as a result of no consequence abortion. They have made no statements about which month of gestation the woman suddenly starts being guilty for arranging the death of her child. They just issued a blanket statement that she is not accountable; that she’s being used; that she is innocent I heard from one corner.

So, I’m simply not moved by that argument at all. AND, this no consequence position goes far back in time. We were duped all along.

Nonetheless, I am willing to hold any candidate to anything he or she has said only in the last 2 years or so.

That makes all of the candidates liable for their recent record, and it seems more than fair to me.

We start with all of them being pro-abortion. I checked even with the Constitution Party and they DO NOT have a statement condemning no consequence abortion.

So, we have no party, we have no home.

We are strangers and pilgrims in this land seeking a better city.


100 posted on 04/12/2016 6:12:49 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Nonetheless, I am willing to hold any candidate to anything he or she has said only in the last 2 years or so.

A man who changed his position only two years ago cannot be trusted to not change his position again in the next two years.

I really want someone who has had a lifetime record of support for conservatism. But then we never really get what we want.

101 posted on 04/12/2016 7:02:05 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson