Clinton: Immunity for gun makers must end (Idiot)

The Hill ^ | April 11, 2016 | Mark Hensch

[familyop]

"Sanders argued on April 4 that victims of gun violence should not be capable of suing manufacturers when criminals abuse their weapons."

Agreed. Criminals should stop abusing their weapons.

[Bob434]

if she becomes president= kiss your second amendment rights goodbye- she has flat out declared she is going to come after our SA rights- and wants to turn this coutnry into a european model of a gunless society-

She’s not simply going to go after gun makers- she’s declared, in public, several times, that she is coming for our guns-

[JimRed]

She’s not simply going to go after gun makers- she’s declared, in public, several times, that she is coming for our guns-

SHE won't be coming after anything. She'll just be sitting back GIVING ORDERS. Many of you have likely read my solution for "those GIVING ORDERS"...It'll have to be applied to those who RELAY the orders first, so they can't be carried out.

[hal ogen]

LIB idiots (aka: h r clintoon) are truly insane.

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

I suppose next it will be no immunity for breweries, wineries, and distilleries when someone is killed in a drunk driving accident.

Hitlery must not be elected.

[Faith Presses On]

We need to be talking again about how violence is glorified in our entertainment, how entertainment in general encourages Godless narcissism, and about SSRI’s.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

Life was perfect before guns were invented!

[5th MEB]

33,000 gun deaths a year? I don’t have any statistics but I would dispute that number just out of common sense.
Automobiles probably kill at least that many people a year, I don’t hear anybody fighting for makeing GM, Ford, Audi, or Mercedes responsible for drunk or stupid drivers.
After all; it is their products that have been killing thousands of people for more years than most of us have even been alive.