Replies

“The Sunday Morning Bray”, by Bray!

Psalm 127:3
Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD: and the fruit of the womb is his reward.

Just when you thought this election could not get any better it just continues to surprise. We have a nation yearning to become more Conservative and we have a Conservatocracy which will not allow it. Apparently to the High Priests of Conservatism you can only be their type of Right. That would be fine if there were actually rules and doxology to follow, yet when it comes to conservatism individuality has always ruled the day.

We have never seen the Presidential numbers or enthusiasm towards the American way of life until this year. We are witnessing the culmination of the Tea Party movement although there are two distinct factions divided between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. Ted Cruz represents a more traditional brand of conservatism which is heavy on dialogue and relates less to the mainstream. Trump is more of a new interpretation which relates more to the average American.

Cruz is a narrower brand of intellect which is a more academic variety. It appeals to those who would rather debate and articulate their philosophy rather than appeal to the broad masses. Cruz appeals to the more wonkish politician or pundit. These are the people who spend their every waking moment discussing how the District of Corruption should work and what would make it work better. They make healthy livings discussing with each other why their plans would work better than the ones which have never worked in the past hundred years.

Most of the Conservative Punditocracy are secularists trying to explain why Christians think the way they do. Pundits like Georgie Will, Kraut, Cupp, Lowrey, Levin, Beck and the rest are atheists who want you to believe they are genuine Conservatives. They want you to believe they can relate to you even though they basically laugh at your spirituality. This is why they do not understand how Cruz does not relate to fundamental Christians. They do not like someone who hides behind the Bible to parse phrases and manipulate rules. What they do not understand is Conservativism is based on Christianity and without it you will never have it, you will only have bigger gummit.

These atheists try to mitigate the damage issues like abortion and homosexual marriage will cost the Party if they were ever truly discussed. What would happen if the issue of homosexuality was exposed for the health danger it actually is. What if they explained that the levels of depression, drug, alcohol and sexual addictions multiply dramatically? What if those same issues were reveled about abortion rather than the sterile secular arguments the atheists want to discuss. What if they were forced to accept the Bible was written to protect man from his own flesh sin?

Today’s pundits want to discuss everything in nice clean little boxes. They want to debate the issues rather than get in there and blow them up. They want to hear themselves talk about social and spiritual issues secularly since they do not want to talk about souls, spirits and God versus Satan. These people do not believe any of that exists since it messes up their clean little world.

What Trump has done to destroy all of this is he has taken Conservatism Main Street. The pundits want to talk about abortion on Constitutional grounds as a States’ rights issue. They would rather the issue was argued in the Courtroom rather than the Court of public opinion. They are more concerned with the number of women voting for abortion than the number of babies killed. When it really comes down to abortion they would rather the issue never existed and will accept the deaths of these babies rather than get their hands dirty.

Trump in five minutes did more towards making abortion understandable than all of the Pro-lifers did in the last twenty years. When he said women should be punished he made average Americans understand what this issue is all about. He said that abortion should be outlawed which it should. Our Country can never be great or free as long as babies are being killed needlessly. We have justified the killing of human beings for convenience. What would be different than saying all blacks should be killed because killing them is better than living in poverty.

When he said women should be punished he broke all of the rules. Nobody is supposed to ay that or women will never vote for Republican candidates. What he said in that brief statement was that women are doing something wrong. In our secular world there is no right or wrong there are only laws made by man. He inferred that there is something more important than man’s laws and inferred morality. This blew the world up on both sides since to agree with this would require real discussion of the killing of babies and why is that wrong.

This is what happens when a novice enters into the halls of Conservatism. He did not know the doxology of years of tired phraseology and just said what made logical sense. If abortion is wrong and there are laws put on the books to stop it then those breaking those laws should be punished. If it is outlawed the man should be punished also and perhaps could lower the numbers of abortions in the first place or increase the number of men in households. This is very messy thinking and nowhere the pundit class in either Party wants to go since the average American understands just like the wall is concrete.

This is the first time in thirty years we have had Conservatism explained so all of America can understand. It may not be pure or rehearsed for an entire life of regurgitation, but it contains all of the tenets of the belief. The pro-life strategy is so old and tired we are accepting the dismemberment of babies before birth and the selling of their body parts. If that is our definition of winning or even influencing the battle we are sadly fooling ourselves. It is time to actually fight the battle and getting behind a marketing genius may be better than having a bunch of atheists surrendering that battle in their name of victory.

Pray America wakes

Note: The above opinion is not necessarily my own, but FReeper Bray’s. If you wish to discuss this, please ping Bray.