Now please get with the program /s
“If you had actually watched the interview”
To me it showed how little Ted Cruz actually stands for. He spent the whole time attacking Trump; O’Reilly had to push him for something positive. That’s the first thing you see in a lying, deceptive politician.
“you would have seen that which you say you yearn for.”
You don’t fool people with your phony Colonel Sanders routine. It doesn’t make you any smarter. You proved it with your observations.
I saw the interview. It’s true, at the very end Cruz rattled off a list of measures that would bring jobs back. I thought he was spot on. Lower corporate taxes, eliminate the IRS, eliminate crippling environmental regulations, repeal Obamacare, a few other good ones that I can’t remember.
In that moment, I liked Cruz and thought to myself, it would be a good thing if he could get himself elected.
Trouble is, that wasn’t the bulk of the interview with O’Rielly. Most of it was indeed focused on misrepresenting Trump. It really bothers me the way he harps on nothing burgers like the meme that since, as a businessman, Trump spread the money around to politicians of both parties, then he must explicitly support the policy positions of those politicians.
Whether it’s true or not, and I believe it is clearly not, the question has been asked and answered. Another one he harps on is the udea that Trump is afraid of him, afraid to debate him. Nobody buys that, so it just names him sound foolish when he repeats it ad nauseam. He has a number of these anti Trump talking points that are not at all convincing and his particular brand of Trump bashing us getting very old and very annoying and very hollow. O’Riely was right to push back on this.
As I said, I did like him for that minute when he rattled off the measures he would take to sour job creation.