Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FourtySeven

>> Only to people who live on the Internet and fancy themselves Constitutional scholars is it still relevant <<

A totally unfair remark. Our latter-day heroine in the NBC world, Dr. Orly Taitz, does not “live on the Internet.” During the daytime, she practices dentistry, and at night she is immersed deeply in the dusty old French-language tomes of Monsieur Vattel, the master explainer of natural-born citizenship.


391 posted on 04/06/2016 12:44:09 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]


To: Hawthorn

The controlling law is the Immigration and Nationality Act, Pub. L. No. 82-414 § 301(a)(7), 66 Stat. 163, 236 (1952).

The foreign-born child is not a citizen if the citizen parent does not meet the requirements of this statute. The foreign-born child is not a

citizen by birth, the foreign-born child is a citizen by statute. A citizen by statute is a naturalized citizen.

http://uscode.house.gov/statviewer.htm?volume=66&page=163


415 posted on 04/06/2016 1:08:26 PM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson