The Enquirer needs to put up or shut up.
NE never does that. They like the slow roast!
Here s what is about to hit stand
5 from last week plus these three for this week
5 HO + 3 HO = 8 HO
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3417256/posts?page=237#234
More detail this week. And a new word for vocabulary lesson. Funny it appears in two of their comments
“The Enquirer needes to put up or shut up.”
The NE has been ‘libeling’ or damaging Ted Cruz’s impeccable reputation just about every day with charges of sexual misconduct.
A charge of sexual misconduct is one of four things that constitutes “defamation per se.”
IOW, if you can show they printed it and it is untrue—it’s defamation of character. Period.
So maybe he knows a lawyer ... they could serve “discovery” with their Complaint: Requests to produce, Interrogatories (questions), requests for admissions, subpoenas duces tecum (produce documents).
The big problem with Romeo filing suit—which most high-powered folks would do if they had in fact been defamed—and especially, one would think, the former partner in a high-powered law firm ... is that truth is an absolute defense to a claim of defamation.
So there’s that one, tiny fly-in-the-ointment for Sinator Don Juan.
The NE has been “putting up.”
Cruz has been sputtering.
Which leads to the conclusion:
It all must be true.