Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/30/2016 5:11:27 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: drewh

She’s going to wear her pink pantsuit to the interview.


2 posted on 03/30/2016 5:12:09 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

He will apologize and let her know that nothing she did appeared to harm national security.


3 posted on 03/30/2016 5:13:47 PM PDT by CMB_polarization
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

What the hell could they talk about?

She’s going in with a wall of attorneys and aides, and so is he.

Theater.


8 posted on 03/30/2016 5:16:18 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Nothing will ever come out of this.

Nothing.

The “big guys” always skate.

.


9 posted on 03/30/2016 5:16:55 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

If James Comey actually DOES do the interview, I am afraid that might not be a good sign.

I’d rather have a serious FBI interrogator doing it.


10 posted on 03/30/2016 5:17:11 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Maybe that is why she quickly left Wisconsin and went back to NY.... Needs to prep with her lawyers for the ‘interview’???


13 posted on 03/30/2016 5:21:30 PM PDT by Bulwinkle (Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

I wonder if ValJar has a direct line to Al-Jazeera and is tipping them off?


14 posted on 03/30/2016 5:21:38 PM PDT by capydick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
'Mrs.Clinton, you didn't do anything wrong, did you?'

'At this point, what difference does it make?'

'Good point! You're cleared.'

15 posted on 03/30/2016 5:22:10 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Comey will inform her that the Justice Department will be going after Judicial Watch for harassing her.


18 posted on 03/30/2016 5:23:24 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

There aren’t many good reasons for the director to be doing the interview himself. The ones I can think don’t bode well for the ‘lets indict Hillary’ crowd.


22 posted on 03/30/2016 5:28:38 PM PDT by Fhios (Going Donald Trump is as close to going John Galt as we'll get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

This is getting tiresome. We all know, or should know, that nothing will come of this “investigation”.


23 posted on 03/30/2016 5:29:26 PM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Prosecute this demonic hypothyroidism plagued wench.


25 posted on 03/30/2016 5:30:22 PM PDT by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh
Interviewed?? Why? Is she on the Oprah Winfrey show?

She should be interrogated under a hot arc light by agents with rubber hoses & Dobermans !

26 posted on 03/30/2016 5:30:40 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Interviewed by the Director?

I didn’t know that the Director of the FBI interviews common criminals. Nor did I know that the FBI interviews common criminals, I thought that they interrogated them.


27 posted on 03/30/2016 5:31:03 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

I don’t see anything that says these “interviews” are under oath.


28 posted on 03/30/2016 5:31:55 PM PDT by dynachrome (We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

the meeting will in fact be an interrogation


34 posted on 03/30/2016 5:34:32 PM PDT by Thibodeaux (leading from behind is following)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Shuster is a huge Lefty, and his career has been moving toward the bottom of the toilet bowl for a long time. Faux News > MSBS > Current TV > Al Jazeera.

Recall, however, that MSBS suspended the knothead in 2008 after he said the Hillary! campaign was pimping out Chelsea, and the Clintons exploded. I’m confident he hates the Clinton Family Criminal Enterprise with a passion, and he relishes reporting on PIAPS’ mounting legal woes.

Coda: Why would a Jew, even a secular Jew, work for Al Jazeera? Of course, Carlos Danger married into the Muslim Brotherhood, so there’s that. The answer probably is that their twisted Leftism is vastly more important to them than opposing the pigs & barbarians who are trying to slaughter every non-Mohammedan on the planet.


37 posted on 03/30/2016 5:35:58 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

The ball is in your court, Director Comey.

Do we have the rule of law or is this a banana republic?


40 posted on 03/30/2016 5:40:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Question 1# Madam Secretary, if you could be an animal, which animal would you be?


46 posted on 03/30/2016 5:47:00 PM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: drewh

Interview hell, cuff ‘er and stuff ‘er!


47 posted on 03/30/2016 5:48:33 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson