Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CaptainK

..Heilemann: What Does Lewandowski Have to Prove, To Prove His Innocence?...

The way it works is that he doesn’t have to provide anything. This is not Napoleonic law. The prosecutor must prove he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If not, he walks.


5 posted on 03/29/2016 4:09:09 PM PDT by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prosecution 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Sasparilla

The attorney also called it De Minimus touching as opposed to battery.


7 posted on 03/29/2016 4:10:59 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Sasparilla

Legall, yeah. But politically he’s guilty until proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he’s innocent. Primarily because he’s a Trump guy.


26 posted on 03/29/2016 4:58:02 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson