Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12

“WOW! Cruz is even more sleazy than I expected.”

You guys want it both ways.

Either sleazy Melania does a sleazy cover shoot and as opposition research sleazy Ted buys the rights.

OR

Saint Melania does a perfectly acceptable covershoot that was the opposite of sleazy and therefore Ted was suckered into buying a positive message for young girls?

What, do you tink that spread wasn’t going to be spread all over the world? If not by Ted then every government in the world who didn’t like The Donald?


34 posted on 03/27/2016 2:30:28 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (wrote Harry Reid.s only biography www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DaxtonBrown

Either way you want, it as long as it destroys Cruz. There.


41 posted on 03/27/2016 2:33:51 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: DaxtonBrown

There’s a difference between nude modeling and inferring that the model is a slut.


89 posted on 03/27/2016 3:07:40 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: DaxtonBrown

The GQ thing featured several super models. 16 years ago when she supporting herself with a modeling career. Models do that stuff to support themselves. Kate Moss was in the same feature in GQ. No big deal,,,, until the “or you could vote for Cruz” banner was added. Cruz is a oozing pilonidal cyst!


124 posted on 03/27/2016 3:31:00 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson