Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Personally, I don’t worry about a lot about a change in the rules, as the LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS are tremendous for those that are part of it...in other words, I think one can reasonably assume that Trump will SUE THE DAYLIGHTS out of anyone involved in a rules change that denies him the nomination.

Of course they’re welcome to try, but Trump is worth $10 BILLION and so those swindlers better have some REALLY DEEP POCKETS as they’ll have to go against his legal team.

(at least that’s my take)


12 posted on 03/25/2016 5:10:11 PM PDT by BobL (A vote for Cruz...is now a vote for Romney / Jeb / Linda / Ryan (at the convention))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BobL

And he NEVER gives up when he believes he’s in the right.


16 posted on 03/25/2016 5:13:36 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: BobL
Personally, I don’t worry about a lot about a change in the rules, as the LEGAL RAMIFICATIONS are tremendous for those that are part of it...in other words, I think one can reasonably assume that Trump will SUE THE DAYLIGHTS out of anyone involved in a rules change that denies him the nomination. Of course they’re welcome to try, but Trump is worth $10 BILLION and so those swindlers better have some REALLY DEEP POCKETS as they’ll have to go against his legal team. (at least that’s my take)

He can sue, but the lawsuit won't go anywhere.

Legally, a political party has the right to make its own rules. Even if Rule 40(b) were a permanent rule, the delegates at the Convention would have the right to change it. Conversely, if the RNC removes Rule 40(b) before the Convention, the delegates at the Convention could reinstate it.

22 posted on 03/25/2016 5:19:06 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: BobL

My understanding is that courts have no jurisdiction over political parties and their rules.


98 posted on 03/25/2016 6:47:04 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: BobL

Problem is if you’re in business you have to pay the crooks in Congress off or they don’t pick up the phone when someone else paid them to change a regulation that will put you out of work.

People overseas have to pay off the crooks in Congress too... I can assure you they don’t give a damn about the ‘speeches’...


148 posted on 03/25/2016 8:19:12 PM PDT by GOPJ (National Enquirer got it right on Gary Hart,Bill Clinton,John Edwards, and now Ted Cruz's mistresses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: BobL

Trump should have ran 3rd party if he didn’t want to deal with Republican rules.


170 posted on 03/26/2016 1:01:02 AM PDT by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson