Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black woman says stop giving money to women for having babies out of wedlock [lots of profanity]
YouTube [10 minute video] ^ | December 13, 2011 | worldstartube's channel

Posted on 03/23/2016 4:10:53 PM PDT by grundle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAre1g_eQhQ

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
In this 10 minute video, which has lots of profanity, the black female speaker says the government should stop giving money to women for having babies out of wedlock. She says the government should force the biological father to pay for raising the child, instead of the taxpayers.

She also says that if she had two daughters, and one had a baby out of wedlock, and the other one got good grades in high school and wanted to go to college, she would give money to the one who wanted to go to college, and not to the one who had the baby out of wedlock.

1 posted on 03/23/2016 4:10:53 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle
Black woman says stop giving money to women for having babies out of wedlock [lots of profanity]

Stop Lyndon Johnson's vote farming scheme? The beneficiaries of the vote farming (Democrats) would never agree to this.

2 posted on 03/23/2016 4:16:39 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
"In today's society, we get awarded for f***ed up behavior"

The very heart of liberalism. Reward failure, punish success. Be nicer to terrorist and what do you get? Fewer terrorist? No, you get more. To anyone with common sense that's obvious.
3 posted on 03/23/2016 4:18:35 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I would raise the ante: The government must be prohibited from giving tax money to men and women for any reason. Period.


4 posted on 03/23/2016 4:18:40 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

Government charity is a bad idea. It’s not theirs to give (to quote Davy Crockett). No government payouts. Ever.

Our society would be very different if people relied on:

1) Themselves
2) Their church
3) Their neighborhood association
4) A benevolent association

Communities can do an excellent job of steering friends and family down a better path. You want help? Listen up, girl, ‘cause you’re living your life all wrong! I’m not giving you more money until you shape up!

A federal bureaucracy, on the other hand, would just keep sending checks forever.


5 posted on 03/23/2016 4:25:56 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking, but I know what I'm thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grundle

What’s sad is she doesn’t even see the real reason...God is gone from the house, her mom and her mom’s mom left God behind, and yes, I mean Jesus, that God.

A combination of LBJ and Nixon’s war on drugs have totally obliterated the nuclear black family. Black pastors won’t even touch the subject; it’s like there is a new gospel which is ok with single moms...yeah, I see the white women who push strollers of mixed kids in the ghetto, so there are white women in this, too, but 99% are black.

So, in sum, this girl in the video is angry at the government but not for the right reasons and is so far inside the bubble she doesn’t see the true evil of the establishment’s happiness that they are dependent and the family is broken up.

When I vote for Trump, I do it with about as much anger as I can imagine. I despise the establishment uniparty; the effort they are making to hang onto their power has actually uncovered even more corruption and evil that I didn’t realize was there - and, I’m about as informed as anyone can get, and even I was partially ignorant. Ugh.


6 posted on 03/23/2016 4:30:17 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Trump is the ticket or the republic ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel
Jesus says that we should store up treasure in Heaven. Most people believe in some form of Karma, that is, the good you do will return to you, or you will be blessed in return for your good works. However, I don't think this works if you have money taken from you in the form of taxes, even if the money goes to help needy people. If you were allowed to keep that tax money and voluntarily give to help the poor, then your reward, or Karma would kick in.

Therefore, by taxing us to give to the poor, THE DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS ARE STEALING OUR ETERNAL REWARD.

7 posted on 03/23/2016 4:30:23 PM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grundle

No doubt she tried hard to avoid profanity, but the necessity for precise communication rendered it impossible.


8 posted on 03/23/2016 4:32:24 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Hain't we got all the fools in town on our side? And ain't that a big enough majority in any town?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Oh my! Hilarious. Black conservative swearing goddess.


9 posted on 03/23/2016 4:34:51 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (#JesuisCharlesMartel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

We finally have a candidate for VP, or maybe Speaker of the House.

A conservative is born.


10 posted on 03/23/2016 4:37:25 PM PDT by AZLiberty (A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Stop funding anyone bringing more GibsMeDats into this world. Plug the hole or sterilize it and its rods.


11 posted on 03/23/2016 4:40:06 PM PDT by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
No doubt she tried hard to avoid profanity, but the necessity for precise communication rendered it impossible.

It was clearly a titanic struggle for her. If there were a censored version of this video, it would be one lo-o-o-o-o-ng bleep. The "bad lip-reading crew" should have a go with this one.

12 posted on 03/23/2016 4:43:40 PM PDT by AZLiberty (A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

She should join the Diamond and Silk team in support of Donald Trump.

They could call it Diamond, Silk, and Get-Yoself-A-Job.


13 posted on 03/23/2016 4:48:29 PM PDT by AZLiberty (A is no longer A, but a pull-down menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
There was a time in England when charity was the purview of the people inspired by their priests giving them sermons on why they needed to help their fellow man (because in helping out their fellow man they were really helping Jesus) and they did help out by creating great foundations of charity, schools, hospitals, etc. where people practiced their corporal and spiritual works of mercy.

And then, the Dissolution of the Monasteries took place.

What Henry did was to take the responsibility of charity out of the hands of the people who were successfully doing the charity. He got all the foundation money and all the jewels and the sales of buildings. And once he took over the responsibility of charity he ignored it all.

Then, because there was little to no charity left and the poor began to move to London.

Later, the problem of begging was so bad in London that Elizabeth had the Beggar Laws passed which jailed people if the were caught begging on the first charge. Second charge they would have a hot poker struck through their ear. And the poor beggars who just could not stop begging sometimes were hanged.

And then, because people were no longer inspired to give to charity by the weekly sermons given by the priests, no one was giving any more. So, Elizabeth had more laws passed which forced people to give up their money to the state for charitable purposes.

Charles Dickens wrote all about it.

So many unintended consequences.

14 posted on 03/23/2016 4:51:52 PM PDT by Slyfox (Donald Trump's First Principle is the Art of the Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

LAKIESHA (?) for VP!!!


15 posted on 03/23/2016 4:59:24 PM PDT by Safetgiver (Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
The 1964 Lyndon Baines Johnson vote farming scheme had nothing to do with charity. It was all about gaining the upper hand politically after the Republicans passed the 24th amendment.

Johnson was a very Racist Southern Democrat, and he didn't give a crap about black people. But he recognized that if he bribed them with government money, he could get all those votes which were newly created by the 24th amendment.

This is how Democrats remained in power for those 40 years.

"Charity" is just the propaganda for what is really going on.

16 posted on 03/23/2016 5:04:34 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Henry VIII did not do it to destroy charity. It was his scheme to gain the upper hand politically over the Church and anyone who did not submit their conscience to him, including the upper classes.

Henry VIII didn't give a crap about the people. He had the people bribed, cajoled and threatened with death and whomever stood in his way there was justice to pay - all so he would have complete power over everyone.

Laws were enacted that essentially eradicated the true essence of English Common Law and with that the people became enslaved to the state.

It took the English hundreds of years to get back to some sort of normalcy and freedom.

Charity was merely the unintended consequence and everyone suffered as a result.

17 posted on 03/23/2016 5:19:36 PM PDT by Slyfox (Donald Trump's First Principle is the Art of the Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
Henry VIII did not do it to destroy charity. It was his scheme to gain the upper hand politically over the Church and anyone who did not submit their conscience to him, including the upper classes.

So he and Lyndon Johnson had similar motives, and we can agree neither one of them were doing it for charity.

It took the English hundreds of years to get back to some sort of normalcy and freedom.

I doubt our current form of government is going to last that long.

18 posted on 03/23/2016 5:27:43 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Or make the fathers pay at least half + the cost of food, rent, clothing, medical PLUS the equivalent cost of 12 hours of day care if they choose not to be hands on parents.

Problem would be soon solved


19 posted on 03/23/2016 5:39:10 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

It is way beyond a vote-farming scheme; it is a Negro-farming scheme where a lot of white people rake in big bucks administering the urban livestock.


20 posted on 03/23/2016 6:11:10 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson