Since you like little stories of rally infiltration, you might enjoy this:
An observer at a Trump rally posted this:
James Troup boldly went to Donald Trump’s Dayton, Ohio, rally last weekend to silently observe the crowd’s response to Trump’s rhetoric and people of color within the audience. Troup’s account of his experience is going viral.
According to Troup, the crowd was mostly white, with a small number of people of color scattered throughout the audience. A big part of the billionaire Republican front-runner’s message that night was based on fear:
“He told Ohioans that only oil was propping up their state and that their economy was in serious trouble. He said this over and over again,” Troup wrote.
“He also told the crowd that ISIS was out to kill them. That ISIS was putting 50 people at a time in cages and drowning them in the ocean. And that we had to kill them first.”
Then, Troup noted that the rally took a noticeably darker turn:
“Cheers for water boarding. Cheers for torture. Calls to cut off their heads… They loved everything that was being said. The calls for the wall. The calls to blow up oil fields. The calls to torture and kill people.”
The rally was intermittently disrupted by protesters. Troup noted how, after being spoon-fed fear and hate by Trump, the audience treated protesters.
“Every time a protestor was kicked out, they were yells to get them out of here, even to KILL THEM!!!” Troup said. “Really? Kill them? For protesting?”
As protesters were escorted out, Trump supporters in the crowd also asked for Troup to be removed, despite his total silence.
So trump is blamed for pointing out what ISIS does? iIs that the point you are making?
Yet another Cruzer following his or her leader in siding with the radical leftists. This sort of post is proof that at least some of his followers know that he has no intention of building a border wall or in taking a hard line against ISIS. So a border wall is a horrible thing if Trump calls for one in the eyes of Cruz supporters now. And ISIS is doing mass drowning in cages. That is not disputable, so attacking Trump for mentioning it is of course saying that criticizing ISIS for their murderous behavior is not acceptable.
A Cruzer is now defending Kasich as a great govenor of Ohio, and taking the line that bringing up Ohio’s wealth from fracking is horribly bad, because Kasich is just that phenomenal, no criticism of him is acceptable. Naturally, some Cruzers will even side with the Moveon types that W.’s waterboarding was a horrible form of torture and anyone promoting it against terrorists is an evil person inciting violence from “peaceful” Marxist protestors.
Naturally, this is the rally in which a radical leftist tried to attack Trump, but the entire post is about building up sympathy for these “protestors” who have repeatedly tried to shout down Trump and stop him from exercising his First Amendment rights (so much for Cruzers as Constitutionalists). Of course, by acting like these radical disruptors, including a would-be attacker, are the victims, that is excusing in the most gross terms the illegal actions of the crazy leftists at that rally and the Chicago “protests” the night before.
I really am starting to believe from the evidence that some of the worse Cruz supporters would be just as damaging for this country as the radical leftists, because they are perfectly willing to side with the Marxists if they think it will help them take down anti-globalist, pro-broders, pro-American workers Trump. What are principles after all to winning at all costs?