To: Zakeet
C’mon! Tell me that watching her try to explain why she charged $500,000 for a half hour speech to a group of bankers, in open court, isn’t the most fun you can have with your clothes on!
3 posted on
03/18/2016 12:43:32 AM PDT by
jonascord
(It's sarcasm unless otherwise noted... This time, it's not.)
To: jonascord
8 posted on
03/18/2016 12:57:38 AM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
To: jonascord
The whole “speaking fees” thing is a fiendishly diabolical technique to hide bribes and influence peddling in plain sight.
9 posted on
03/18/2016 12:57:54 AM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: jonascord
Um... that’s what they offered?
154 posted on
03/18/2016 8:09:01 AM PDT by
ichabod1
(Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
To: jonascord
She would not be in open court for a very long time after the election.
176 posted on
03/18/2016 8:34:56 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(Some of you keep telling yourself -- Romney would have been as bad or worse.)
To: jonascord
“C’mon! Tell me that watching her try to explain why she charged $500,000 for a half hour speech to a group of bankers, in open court, isn’t the most fun you can have with your clothes on!”
Watching it with my clothes off wouldn’t be any less fun, just a lot kinkier.
289 posted on
03/19/2016 8:39:02 AM PDT by
PLMerite
(The Revolution...will not be kind.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson