Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Faces National Security Establishment ‘Uprising’ Over Emails
The Daily Caller ^ | 03/16/2016 | Richard Pollock

Posted on 03/17/2016 8:31:25 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo

Democratic presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is facing an “uprising” in the national security establishment prompted by long-standing anger about her cavalier handling of classified materials and government secrets.

As Clinton’s case progresses, it appears the probe is being directed by intelligence and national security law enforcement authorities rather than civilian agencies subject to political influence, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.

There are currently at least four national security investigations, including those by the FBI, Department of Justice, and the inspectors general for the Department of State and the Intelligence Community.

“The way I’m reading this is that there’s this uprising in the national security bureaucracies to prosecute Mrs. Clinton,” Tom Fitton told TheDCNF. Fitton is president of the nonprofit government watchdog Judicial Watch, which is preparing to depose top Clinton aides and possibly her as well, in litigation stemming from the State Department’s maladroit handling of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: laplata
They’ll fall in line once she’s sworn in as Chancellor... err President.

If Hitlery becomes POTUS, her wrath will be thorough and vicious. Those who opposed her will be in for very bad times.


Hillary Rotten Criminal will always have to live with the knowledge in the back of her mind that somewhere there is probably a latter day version of Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg lurking in the shadows with enough explosives to blow her treasonous ass back to Hell where she came from.
41 posted on 03/17/2016 9:47:56 AM PDT by mkjessup (Ted Cruz - what a colossal and tragic disappointment. "Cruz is lozin' it" - JimRob - exact quote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

“Here’s my question: doesn’t the FBI have enough to charge her now? “

I believe they do. What’s happening now is the dotting and crossing. When the FBI drops this on the Lynch it’s going to be both air and watertight to 5 atmospheres.

L


42 posted on 03/17/2016 9:50:46 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Anyone in the uniformed services, or diplomatic corps should worry Madam Benghazi would readily abandon them, when under fire, for political expediency, so much so, that they have a score to be settled.
43 posted on 03/17/2016 9:51:57 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (My Forefathers Would Be Shooting By Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

I think she set up the private server so she could have a ‘confidential’ link to Sidney Blumenthal. His paws are all over this.


44 posted on 03/17/2016 10:17:52 AM PDT by olepap (Your old Pappy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
I heard it too, but - what she requested was a secure phone that could be taken in to a SCIF - where no phones, cameras, flash drives or recordable media are allowed. Period.

What she requested was a secure phone like that given Obama, who apparently has a very special "blackberry", not the off the shelf ones that the rest of the world gets. She was denied that very special phone because she had no business bringing a forbidden item into a SCIF. Apparently the NSA has types that are exempt, but she was not high enough on the totem pole (can I say that?) to get one.

So, if she had to make a call, she had to go out into the hall and retrieve her phone from the lockbox like the rest of the us would.

45 posted on 03/17/2016 10:22:03 AM PDT by par4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
If Hillary walks away from this, by precedent, it effectively renders national security law a moot issue.

Regardless of whether it involves information classification, export control, weapons proliferation, etc. - it just won't matter anymore.


46 posted on 03/17/2016 10:22:56 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

“I don’t agree with the single point that HRC “went to considerable trouble”.

Have you ever tried to help a middle-aged woman set up an email account, or access a server over a network?

Hell yes she went to considerable trouble!


47 posted on 03/17/2016 10:30:05 AM PDT by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

Not as long as we have the 2nd amendment.


48 posted on 03/17/2016 10:32:17 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Whatever happens will look like an accident. My guess would be an induced medical emergency that results in a quick death.


That’s about it. Headlines the next day:

“Hillary dies peacefully in her sleep”.


49 posted on 03/17/2016 10:34:31 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

I think you are right.

The Secret Service detests her. I don’t think those guys would go the extra mile to protect her. In fact, they might look the other way and make it look like incompetence.

And if she doesn’t become POTUS, she won’t be able to come through with her promises to the donors. They will want their money back or else. She’s screwed no matter what.

I’d still prefer a sharp knife and a scary mask and her messing her Depends when she realized what was happening. I’m not advocating anything.


50 posted on 03/17/2016 10:40:23 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BikerJoe

For personal privacy you use a normal email address like everyone else. I worked for county government for a long time and then a private Corp. I would have never used my work email for private stuff. I always had a work email and a private email.........just like everyone in the whole wide world.


51 posted on 03/17/2016 10:42:54 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Riiiiiiiiiight.


52 posted on 03/17/2016 10:45:37 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

If such things are bring thought about, I suspect they will see larger opportunity in placing their pick as her VP.

Ergo, her pick of VP will be factored as a life insurance policy to protect herself from such machinations.

A convenient mechanism for the rise of the AntiChrist.


53 posted on 03/17/2016 10:55:35 AM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

She totally skates and not a damned thing is done about it. These are the Clinton’s we are talking about here. This is all so much wasted energy.

Only death will stop them.


54 posted on 03/17/2016 10:57:29 AM PDT by Buckeye Battle Cry (Hillary - Ethically sleazy and politically stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Just read where obama is privately urging donors to back hillary.

The fix is in already.

She skates.


55 posted on 03/17/2016 11:03:57 AM PDT by Comment Not Approved (When bureaucrats outlaw hunting, outlaws will hunt bureaucrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

A convenient mechanism for the rise of the AntiChrist.

I see your point. But Obama has already put that in place and such an event could firm up the deal.


56 posted on 03/17/2016 11:11:14 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

To: Night Hides Not

“Here’s my question: doesn’t the FBI have enough to charge her now? “

I believe they do. What’s happening now is the dotting and crossing. When the FBI drops this on the Lynch it’s going to be both air and watertight to 5 atmospheres.

L


I agree.


57 posted on 03/17/2016 11:12:47 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

And that, my FRiend, is the true purpose of the Second Amendment. . .it isn’t about duck hunting, its about keeping the government in check.


58 posted on 03/17/2016 11:12:52 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: laplata

I think I see a new angle.

The recent SAP revelations of her private server indicates that when she is prosecuted, even the President would face charges if he were to pardon her. So, the prosecution and conviction play out into the new year, assuming she becomes President as Clinton II, but then to pardon her, she would be recused. Congress would then be called upon for impeachment proceedings, and we would be left with the 2nd Impeachment of a Clinton Presidency.

There must be a Bible Code out there on Clinton Impeachment.


59 posted on 03/17/2016 11:22:19 AM PDT by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

I can see your angle, too. I think anything can happen.

It’s absolutely an abomination that she is even running under the circumstances she has created.

I’ve looked and haven’t found anything in Bible Codes about her that indicates impeachment.

It’s been a while since I looked so maybe now there is something. I’ll let you know and please do the same.


60 posted on 03/17/2016 11:35:10 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson