Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
So we shouldn’t let the other states weigh in? I’d be pissed if I was in California and I didn’t get a choice in who the party nominee is.

How is that different from the last 40 years or so? I live in Illinois, our primary is before California's. For the last near 40 years, the Presidential race and who the candidate will be has been decided long before the race ever got to Illinois. Our going to the polls on primary day has been a mere formality.

Why should California be any different?

24 posted on 03/17/2016 6:23:10 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: usconservative

Because this is a close election. That’s the point in going last in that you can have a voice during the end game. Otherwise why have any primaries after Super Tuesday? Just let the first couple handful of states decide.

Honestly I think they need to update the primary process. Go in 1/3 chunks and rotate them.


32 posted on 03/17/2016 6:26:54 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: usconservative

It isn’t, and the premise was laughable.

Cruz needs to do the right thing, drop out with grace.


68 posted on 03/17/2016 6:38:52 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson