Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie

This isn’t just North Dakota; I wouldn’t have bother posting and commenting if that were the case.

Mr. Hoagland is speaking out loud what the majority of the RINOs are already thinking and plotting. They do not want a conservative Presidential candidate under the GOP banner and are willing to throw the election if that’s what it takes.


8 posted on 03/16/2016 11:48:30 AM PDT by walford ("In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: walford

But to an extent he is correct. You are generally voting for delegates, not the person running. And to make it clear, some states tell the parties that the top vote getters must get the delegates, to avoid exactly what he is proposing.

After the first ballot, the requirement of adhering to the primary election results is removed.

Same thing with the election. You do not vote for President: you vote for electors. I think most of them are bound to vote the outcome by law also.


27 posted on 03/16/2016 12:22:53 PM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: walford

GOPe means to throw the election in any event. The whole story for them is the Nomination which is the ultimate award for service to the GOPe. Those so honored do not wish to be discommoded by being forced to assume office and the GOPe does not wish to upset its arrangement with the ruling Democrat Party by permitting them to be elected.


35 posted on 03/16/2016 1:05:05 PM PDT by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson