Skip to comments.
GOP Establishment Elites Discuss How to Stop Trump — ‘All He Has Going for Him Is a Lot of Votes’
breitbart.com ^
| 13 Mar 2016
| REBECCA MANSOUR
Posted on 03/13/2016 9:19:21 PM PDT by Helicondelta
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: Helicondelta
the conclusive consensus seems they can effectively do nothing.
they can’t fathom that all the other candidates lack in total what trump has in spades and that is the charismatic bravado of a leader
they are playing the old game by the numbers not realizing that is not the game Trump is playing and winning
41
posted on
03/14/2016 4:46:43 AM PDT
by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
 |
"Well! We Can't Have That!!!"
|
42
posted on
03/14/2016 4:47:56 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
To: Helicondelta
I know Vin Weber. Long time MN connections. His only interest in politics is the paycheck.
43
posted on
03/14/2016 4:51:35 AM PDT
by
Solson
(Trump plays to win. Deal with it.)
To: silverleaf
I never would have thought men at that level of access to Establshment political power believed their own misinformation<\i> Of course they do. Evil has to believe that it is good. Only the very most depraved can possibly know that they have abandoned good and be proud of their defiance of it.
44
posted on
03/14/2016 6:27:26 AM PDT
by
chesley
(Obama -- Muslim or dhimmi? And does it matter?)
To: papertyger
>>>procedural objections to defend thwarting the will of the people by procedural machinations.
You seem to agree with Trump that a majority is a “random number.”
45
posted on
03/14/2016 7:29:42 AM PDT
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: D-fendr
You seem to agree with Trump that a majority is a “random number.” What I believe in is "consent of the governed."
It's a concept that has been ignored and/or subverted by the "experts" (in the Friedrich Hayek sense) for far too long.
46
posted on
03/14/2016 7:46:57 AM PDT
by
papertyger
(-/\/\/\-)
To: Helicondelta
You can’t make this stuff up!
47
posted on
03/14/2016 8:19:10 AM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson