Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Project 11356M Admiral Grigorovich Frigate Handed Over to Russian Navy
Tass, Russia ^ | March 2016

Posted on 03/11/2016 12:20:08 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

The Baltic Shipyards shipbuilding plant (a subsidiary of the United Shipbuilding Corporation, OCK) has handed over 'Admiral Grigorovich' Project 11356 frigate (Krivak-V/Admiral Grigorovich-class type ship) to Russian Navy, according to the plant`s official spokeperson, Sergei Mikhailov.

The Admiral Grigorovich class is the latest class of frigates ordered by the Russian Navy for the Black Sea Fleet. Picture: Yantar Shipyard

"The chairperson of the ship`s state inspection, Gennady Dmitriev signed the ship acceptance certificate on the board of the 'Admiral Grigorovich' frigate", Mikhailov said. According to Dmitriev, the ship "fully confirmed the claimed specifications during the sea trials".

The OCK`s Vice-President for naval shipbuilding, Igor Ponomarev, in his turn, pointed out that the Corporation is to hand over two Project 11356 frigates (namely, 'Admiral Essen' and 'Admiral Makarov') and 'Ivan Gren' Project 11711 landing ship (Ivan Gren-class) to Russian Navy in 2016.

The flag-raising ceremony on the board of the 'Admiral Grigorovich' frigate will take place on March 11, according to Mikhailov. 'Admiral Grigorovich' is to be commissioned to the Black Sea fleet of Russian Navy.

Project 11356 frigates are intended for anti-ship and anti-submarine operations in both off-shore and ocean areas. The ships can provide air defense both individually and as a part of ship order.

Project 11356 firgates are equipped with 100mm A-190 naval gun, Kalibr-NK (SS-N-27 Sizzler) cruise missiles, Shtil/Shtil-1 (SA-N-7 Gadfly/SA-N-7C Gollum) naval surface-to-air (SAM) systems, torpedoes and one Ka-27 (Helix) helicopter (optionally). Project 11356 frigate has a draft of 3620 t, a length of 124.8 m, a maximum speed of 30 kt and a range of 4850 nm.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: admiralgrigorovich; frigate; krivak; russia

1 posted on 03/11/2016 12:20:08 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Swept back, step back, weenie pack, Krivak...hmm, doesn’t work anymore?


2 posted on 03/11/2016 12:48:21 AM PST by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Ship’s draft is the distance from the surface of the water to the lowest point of the ship. It is NOT measured in tons; but by feet.


3 posted on 03/11/2016 1:10:36 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

Yep. 3620 t would be a displacement, not a draft.


4 posted on 03/11/2016 1:30:01 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe; NTHockey

That should be an error by the source: mixing up draft with displacement.


5 posted on 03/11/2016 1:41:30 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Pretty much a fundamental error. (someone had a hard time in Nautical Stuff for Landlubbers 101).


6 posted on 03/11/2016 1:43:25 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That is a good looking ship.


7 posted on 03/11/2016 1:56:28 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

And it has a gun!


8 posted on 03/11/2016 2:38:24 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

I’m for that! I think some times about the Desmoines Class of heavy cruisers. 8” automatic guns in thre x three turrets. (Sigh)


9 posted on 03/11/2016 3:19:04 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Better looking than what came out of Bath Iron Works a few months ago. For sure.


10 posted on 03/11/2016 4:35:00 AM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine
Agree. The raised and swept bow looks like it comes from a large racing yacht. Low clean fantail, purposeful looking superstructure without a lot of cruft...

If the US had decided to make one of these it would still be in the design phase. Mission creep would have expanded the scope of the requirements to where it cost 10x as much, displaced 4x times as much, could fight any kind of sea or littoral battle single-handed... And in the end, 10 years from now the Navy would get 3 of these that sort-of work. Well, just as soon as the block-xyz software is available...

11 posted on 03/11/2016 4:39:41 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

Sadly you are right. Enough to make one weep


12 posted on 03/11/2016 8:15:01 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: twister881

I haven’t heard that in a few decades...what community were you?


13 posted on 03/11/2016 9:43:55 AM PST by Magnum44 (I dissent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

When I was in Viet Nam I loved the 8” gun cruisers.


14 posted on 03/12/2016 5:03:05 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps
If the US had decided to make one of these it would still be in the design phase.

The basic design for this ship started in 1997. This particular ship was laid down in 2010 and has just been commissioned. You don't think the U.S. doesn't do better than that?

15 posted on 03/12/2016 5:12:42 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Well, consider the DDG-1000 Zumwalt. It started life as SC-21 (surface combatant, 21st century) in 1994. This came out of studies started in 1987. SC-21 morphed into DD-21, then DD(X), now DDG-1000. First construction began in 2011, and we've got what, one still in sea trials?

So yeah, this ship has literally been in the works for 29 years. For some people that could be an entire career.

16 posted on 03/12/2016 5:31:28 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson