Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here’s Why Hillary Clinton Is Unlikely To Be Indicted
Investors Business Daily ^ | 3/8 | Ruth Marcus

Posted on 03/09/2016 5:52:33 AM PST by TangledUpInBlue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Colinsky

Is this true: Mrs. Bill was never admitted to the bar? Missed that; it may have never been publicized, as it would upset the American people to know this.


41 posted on 03/09/2016 8:09:24 AM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

All of his examples are just examples of how ruling class democrats are rarely punished for felonies. In other words, it’s not an argument as to whether Clinton is a criminal. It’s an argument that prosecutors don’t take felonies from folks like Sandy Berger and HRC seriously. The one exception he cites, David Petraeus, pissed off a ruling class democrat and went to jail.


42 posted on 03/09/2016 8:30:01 AM PST by ModelBreaker (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue
Title 18 USC Section 793(f) states:

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Subparagraph(g) states: If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.

I highlighted the word abstracted because one of the definitions of this word is: "to draw or take away; remove." If Hillary ordered a subordinate to remove classified markings, i.e. Confidential, Secret, Top-Secret, from any documents before sending it to her un-secured server, I believe that would constitute an "abstraction" as defined in the statute and would be a potential felony.
43 posted on 03/09/2016 9:34:25 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson