Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HomerBohn

This article is a hot, steaming pile of crap.

Income taxes aren’t a fraud or a deception on anyone, they’re just a bad way to raise revenue. A consumption tax being the obvious alternative.

How about that? We could throw out about 70,000 pages of regulatory details and rules and nobody would have any reason to lobby for this or that special treatment in the future.

Not to mention that we could get rid of maybe 90-95,000 of our 100,000 IRS employees.

A tax that encourages investment. No special treatment possible. I’ll vote for that and anyone who supports it every single time.


7 posted on 03/07/2016 4:35:31 AM PST by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AntiScumbag

With 70,000 pages of rules, most of which will not be interpreted the same way by any two IRS representatives, anyone can be controlled under penalty of law. The ‘money’ is always secondary. The control is key.


9 posted on 03/07/2016 4:45:29 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: AntiScumbag

Imagine the hundreds of millions of dollars each year that we would save by having a flat consumption tax?


11 posted on 03/07/2016 5:23:33 AM PST by bigtoona (The media, GOPe, dems, commie Pope, hate Trump. He is the destroyer we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: AntiScumbag
Pretty much how it is....


27 posted on 03/07/2016 10:09:35 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson