Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: william clark
Forbes: Ted Cruz's Business Flat Tax is a VAT
37 posted on 03/05/2016 6:18:20 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson
PS. "Most countries also exempt many items—such as food and medicine—while the Cruz business flat tax has a very broad base." Forbes, Id.

In other words, Cruz's plan is even more regressive and oppressive than a European style VAT.

38 posted on 03/05/2016 6:20:38 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: AndyJackson

The headline is self-contradictory. If it’s flat, there’s no way it can be stuctured as a VAT. Of course, if you want to redefine terms to support your assertion, go ahead. Then who’s the fraud and scammer?


42 posted on 03/05/2016 6:25:59 AM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: AndyJackson

Forbes is wrong. Forbes States that charging a 16% business flat tax will result in the cost of goods being raised 16%. This is an untrue assumption. Forbes is not counting the financial savings to the company of the other tax which was replaced by the flat rate. Because of that, it is NOT logical to assume that the 16% must be passed on through the cost of the goods sold


50 posted on 03/05/2016 7:22:58 AM PST by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is..." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson