Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Model of the aircraft carrier project 23000E at the «Army 2015» exhibition. Source: wikipedia.org/Artem Tkachenko

More a Russian wish than anything else!

1 posted on 03/02/2016 5:43:49 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

You’d think that last f****g they got from the Russians would have learned ‘em something


2 posted on 03/02/2016 5:46:33 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The designer said that, according to preliminary estimates, the resistance to the movement of the ship will be about 30% less than the traditional contour of the body.

30%???
Every navy’s dream.
Hahaha.


3 posted on 03/02/2016 5:50:17 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

As a basis of comparison, the new Royal Navy carriers, the Queen Elizabeth Class, displace 70,000 tons. The new USN Ford Class displaces 100 K tons.


4 posted on 03/02/2016 5:57:04 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Conventional carriers are cheaper to operate, crew training is much easier, damage control easier, more survivable, and cost less to build. Once on station a conventional CV has the exact same mission capabilities as nuclear carrier.


9 posted on 03/02/2016 6:04:11 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Because the Russians have so much experience at carrier design, contruction, and operation.

Probably not a good decision.


12 posted on 03/02/2016 6:20:50 AM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Am I detecting a Split Island on that Carrier?
Wonder who they copied that idea from......


13 posted on 03/02/2016 6:23:04 AM PST by moose07 (DMCS (Dit Me Cong San ) - Nah. Put the Cheese down and step away.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What are Indian naval requirements?

1. They need to secure the Indian Ocean from Chinese incursion.

2. They need to secure their own sea lines of communication, especially for oil from the Persian Gulf, from Pakistan and prevent the Pakistani navy from projecting power to India’s shores.

#1 could be accomplished with a sizeable SU-27 and P-8 base on Greater Nicobar island, controlling the exit of the Malacca Strait and several submarines at the Sunda Strait. A carrier would be a plus for both situations, but not a hard requirement.

#2 can be handled with a combination of India based aircraft and IN surface vessels. Again, a carrier would be a plus, but not a must.


14 posted on 03/02/2016 6:25:30 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The bow catapults on the model are interesting. They don’t look like full launching catapults like the French and we use, but rather boosters to get the aircraft up to some speed before hitting the ski jump.

Fascinating hybrid concept. Allows for higher launch loads, but also allows lighter aircraft to still be launched by deck run alone if the booster catapults break.


15 posted on 03/02/2016 6:27:25 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Izvestia says it so it must be true!


18 posted on 03/02/2016 6:54:23 AM PST by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why would you want a carrier that has both catapult launch and springboard launch?


23 posted on 03/02/2016 8:55:20 AM PST by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson