[AntiScumbag]

Dude, you’re a self-admitted income tax evader.

You spout Hendrickson’s “federal privilege” nonsense in post after word-salad post. You brag about finding the “truth” and thus paying no federal income taxes for 10 years. You fail to understand that every time any federal court at any level has considered his nonsense “theory,” it has been rejected. Every. Single. Time.

Hendrickson used his rubbish on his own return and was convicted and sentenced to federal prison.

You’re playing with fire.

[patlin]

You know what your problem is? You have no clue what the legal definition of “income” is. I do, and therefore, I only report what the law defines is “income”, capiche?

So. Pacific v Lowe, 247 US 330, (1918)

“...’income’, as used in the statute should be given a meaning so as [not] to include everything that comes in. The true function of the words, ‘gains’ and ‘profits’ is to limit the meaning of the word ‘income’....We must reject... the broad contention submitted in behalf of the government that all receipts— everything that comes in— are income...”