Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Won’t Seek Access to Encrypted User Data
The New York Times ^ | October 10, 2015 | Nicole Perlroth & David E Sanger

Posted on 02/25/2016 9:08:22 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights

CUPERTINO, Calif. - The Obama administration has backed down in its bitter dispute with Silicon Valley over the encryption of data on iPhones and other digital devices, concluding that it is not possible to give American law enforcement and intelligence agencies access to that information without also creating an opening that China, Russia, cybercriminals and terrorists could exploit. With its decision, which angered the F.B.I. and other law enforcement agencies, the administration essentially agreed with Apple, Google, Microsoft and a group of the nation's top cryptographers and computer scientists that millions of Americans would be vulnerable to hacking if technology firms and smartphone manufacturers were required to provide the government with "back doors," or access to their source code and encryption keys.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

BS....Bill Gates said Apple should open it.


2 posted on 02/25/2016 9:10:39 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

http://la-kabylie.com/2016/02/25/bill-gates-sides-against-apple-in-federal-bureau-of/


3 posted on 02/25/2016 9:11:45 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

What is on the killer’s phone that is not available from provider’s phone records (numbers, time duration), GPS tracking records (location over time), emails (archiving) from internet providers???? NSA is supposed track terrorists!?!
All that can be acquired without having the physical phone.

It all looks like another version of going after the gun ban after random killing.

What is left of citizen’s privacy ???
You already pay for your phone that gives the almighty government free access to your private activity.
Yeah, freedom for terrorists, spying on citizens!


4 posted on 02/25/2016 9:14:27 AM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeeepeesssssed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Crap-I hit post before I finished my comment

The money quote is further down...

“...White House officials said they would continue trying to persuade technology companies to help them in investigations, but they did not specify how...”

The ‘how’ is clear. Obama has chosen to bypass legislation, taking it straight to the courts. He is a community organizer and this is what they do to get what they want.

By leaving this to the courts, his hands are clean. No one can accuse him of bypassing privacy privacy rights.


5 posted on 02/25/2016 9:14:38 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

See post 5.


6 posted on 02/25/2016 9:16:09 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
0bama says one thing and means another.
0bama Won't Overtly Seek Access to Encrypted User Data.
The search for clandestine back doors is still on.

7 posted on 02/25/2016 9:16:57 AM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian
See post 5.

The significance I put to this is not that Obama agrees with Cook or me. It is that he has chosen this to be settled in the courts as opposed to legislation. The San Bernadino case is the perfect venue for the government to get around legislation.

8 posted on 02/25/2016 9:18:38 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

Exactly the point I was going to make. But I hit post instead of edit.
:(


9 posted on 02/25/2016 9:19:33 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Screw Obama.

I don’t care if they have to waterboard Tim Cook, Apple has to unlock that g-damned phone! American lives may be at stake.


10 posted on 02/25/2016 9:20:17 AM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first and then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian

The NSA, for all their billions in funding for that agency, demonstrates themselves to be essentially valueless.


11 posted on 02/25/2016 9:20:34 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

“creating an opening that China, Russia, cybercriminals and terrorists could exploit.”

Forgot one. The US establishment.


12 posted on 02/25/2016 9:20:45 AM PST by swisher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Actually, Gates said in a subsequent interview that he was shocked at how his comments had been misinterpreted. He did NOT mean to imply that Apple should comply.


13 posted on 02/25/2016 9:22:02 AM PST by Hurricane Andrew (There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

No, he didn’t, he even went on to another show to discuss the fact that he was mis-quoted by whomever stated that, or that he was misunderstood by those reporting it.

http://www.theverge.com/2016/2/23/11098592/bill-gates-fbi-apple-comments


14 posted on 02/25/2016 9:22:32 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swisher

I asked the mods to delete my comment after the article. Comment incomplete and conveys the opposite point of what I was going to make.


15 posted on 02/25/2016 9:23:05 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Is this like Hillary telling Obama to "Call off your F***ing dogs!" ?

Political alliances determining who obeys the law and who does not? Hmmmm.....

16 posted on 02/25/2016 9:23:55 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

As I said before, if we are dependent upon an iPhone to stop a terrorist attack we are already doomed.


17 posted on 02/25/2016 9:24:18 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

This article is from October 2015.


18 posted on 02/25/2016 9:25:24 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Like he is REALLY worried that a commie friend would get the info. More likely get HIS info. I hope all the scum that voted for the Scum In Chief are proud of themselves for what they put into the President’s chair, so he could put his nasty feet on the desk. I had always thought LBJ, Nixon and Carter were the worse to hold the office. I now have a new one that over does all those three added together. A non-citizen elected to the office. If a republican had run for office, using his excuses and back ground, the MSM and dimocommies would have had a cow.


19 posted on 02/25/2016 9:25:30 AM PST by RetiredArmy (Read 1 Corinthians 15: verses 1-4. This is the Gospel of Grace, the ONLY WAY TO BE SAVED!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

“American lives may be at stake.”

You are so right- and naturally if they need to do house-to-house searches and look at everyone’s library records and download histories and browser histories and track your car’s travels and make networks of all your contacts and edit newspaper articles and block certain posts on social media and take people in for interrogation and demand copies of everything you photograph and interview your neighbors to determine your loyalty, it’s all worth it!

For the children.


20 posted on 02/25/2016 9:25:59 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson