Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/15/2016 6:48:43 PM PST by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: grimalkin

Excellent!

If they are able, they should be required to do this.


2 posted on 02/15/2016 6:51:17 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

Well now...somebody could use this data against any socialist agenda....couldn’t they?


3 posted on 02/15/2016 6:52:21 PM PST by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

4 posted on 02/15/2016 6:52:26 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

LePage/Trump 2016!


5 posted on 02/15/2016 6:55:57 PM PST by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

Shelter bed nights in Portland Maine were also down in 2015, so these ABAWDs are not suddenly going homeless.


6 posted on 02/15/2016 6:57:37 PM PST by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

Such reforms are Impossible in places like NY, IL and CA - politicians depend on this class of voters to stay in power.


8 posted on 02/15/2016 6:59:59 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin; All
After some scratching, ABAWD is evidently a federal social spending program, corrections welcome.
Able-bodied Adults Without Dependents

The major constitutinal problem with this vote-winning federal welfare program is that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to reasonably establish such a program.

In other words, Maine and other states could arguably afford to run their own ABAWD programs if the corrupt federal government was not stealing state revenues in the form of unconstitutional federal taxes.

”Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” - Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

10 posted on 02/15/2016 7:27:13 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

This work requirement would have interfered with their off-the-books jobs. They’re too busy working to work!


11 posted on 02/15/2016 7:33:13 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

As WFB once wrote, when you subsidize something you get more of it, like illegitimacy and cheese.


12 posted on 02/15/2016 7:33:44 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


13 posted on 02/15/2016 7:44:05 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

Bump for later.


30 posted on 02/15/2016 10:32:39 PM PST by Springman (Rest In Peace YaYa123, Bahbah, and Just Lori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grimalkin

Add mandatory drug testing and the case load will drop even further.


31 posted on 02/16/2016 3:15:00 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson