Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: House Atreides

So private agreements were negotiated. If the pipeline is built, the threat of eminent domain will face each landowner. So negotiating a better deal now makes sense. But if eminent domain did not exist, it is a lot more likely that there would be hold-outs. From the small part of it that I read, the article does not prove what it purports to.


5 posted on 02/11/2016 6:21:52 PM PST by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Stingray51

That’s all well and good to say when its the other guy.


6 posted on 02/11/2016 6:23:56 PM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Stingray51

That’s because “the article” has an agenda. It’s to satisfy Tom Donahue and the Chamber of Cronies.


10 posted on 02/11/2016 6:31:04 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Yuge 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Stingray51

Hooray!

I found a reader who has reading comprehension!

Eminent domain is like wo many other things. It gives one a choice between two paths.

Negotiate or litigate.

So 96% negotiated rather than litigate.

And people who comprehend only that which they wish to see will always be with us and are best ignored.


11 posted on 02/11/2016 6:34:09 PM PST by old curmudgeon (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson