I think winning means you got the most votes.
Has that changed? lol
When it comes to political strategy for a distributed election that takes place over time (like primaries) no, “winning” isn’t just about the most votes in a single race.
It’s about positioning for the upcoming races.
The point the article is making is that with a very weak (overall) Kasich having supplanted Rubio, we’re really looking at a two-way race between Trump and Cruz in South Carolina and going into Super Tuesday; states where Cruz’ strength with Evangelicals will be a benefit.
Thats all, not more complicated than that. But also not as simple as who won the most votes.