Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Puts Obama's Clean Power Plan on Hold
ABCNEWS ^ | 09 February 2016 | By michael biesecker and sam hananel

Posted on 02/09/2016 3:57:46 PM PST by maddog55

A divided Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to halt enforcement of President Barack Obama's sweeping plan to address climate change until after legal challenges are resolved.

The surprising move is a blow to the administration and a victory for the coalition of 27 mostly Republican-led states and industry opponents that call the regulations "an unprecedented power grab."

By temporarily freezing the rule the high court's order signals that opponents have made a strong argument against the plan. A federal appeals court last month refused to put it on hold.

The court's four liberal justices said they would have denied the request.

The plan aims to stave off the worst predicted impacts of climate change by reducing carbon dioxide emissions at existing power plants by about one-third by 2030.

Appellate arguments are set to begin June 2.

The compliance period starts in 2022, but states must submit their plans to the Environmental Protection Administration by September or seek an extension.

Many states opposing the plan depend on economic activity tied to such fossil fuels as coal, oil and gas. They argued that power plants will have to spend billions of dollars to begin complying with a rule that may end up being overturned.

FYI: Dissenting from the court's action were the four Democratic appointees: Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; energy; epa; globalwarminghoax; waroncoal
Dissenters not surprising....
1 posted on 02/09/2016 3:57:46 PM PST by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maddog55
The court's four liberal justices said they would have denied the request.

Once enough liberals are on the court, the people and states will be nothing but slaves.

2 posted on 02/09/2016 4:01:51 PM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron

The four Stalins are certainly not on the side of personal liberty.


3 posted on 02/09/2016 4:05:20 PM PST by Paladin2 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I hate the “lesser of two evils” option, and depending on who the Republicans put up I may avoid it, but if there was ever a reason to vote for a flawed GOP nominee, the make-up of the Supreme Court provides one.

And yes, I do recognize that Republican presidents have nominated some real buttholes - but the Dem presidents have put in *nothing but* world-class buttholes.


4 posted on 02/09/2016 4:10:17 PM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

The Republic teeters on a very thin edge.


5 posted on 02/09/2016 4:11:45 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

Well put.


6 posted on 02/09/2016 4:12:49 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
As usual msm reporting: "...a divided supreme court.." when they lose 5-4.

But when they win 5-4, reporting goes as: "the supreme court in a strong decision..."

7 posted on 02/09/2016 4:14:47 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

It was only blocked, not thrown out. Lower courts still have cases pending. 0bama could still win.


8 posted on 02/09/2016 4:26:37 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Nothing pulls a sinking campaign out of the benjo ditch like a doddering old white haired
whore-master in granny glasses with a brain half eaten away by the dreaded Black Syphilis.


9 posted on 02/09/2016 4:33:05 PM PST by Iron Munro (The wise have stores of choice food and oil but a foolish man devours all he has. Proverbs 21:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron

The liberal justices always vote for liberal causes, regardless of the merrit of the case, with no media pushback.


10 posted on 02/09/2016 4:36:25 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The Bush family needs to just go away. The Clinton family needs just to go to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


11 posted on 02/09/2016 4:43:20 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron

We still have guns.


12 posted on 02/09/2016 5:00:39 PM PST by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
FYI: Dissenting from the court's action were the four Democratic appointees: Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Sickening that none of these 4 give a rats rear end about the constitution.

13 posted on 02/10/2016 11:47:16 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson