These companies are not doing it for personal and political gain. They are not using Vets as political pawns. There is a difference but you are too damned stupid to understand.
“These companies are not doing it for personal and political gain. They are not using Vets as political pawns. There is a difference but you are too damned stupid to understand.”
I may be an idiot, but so are you.
Ok, so what kind of pawns are these companies using the Vets for in the link I sent, then? Or are you dumb enough to think that they did this without any expectation of getting credit, for their donations?
It’s a two way street. A charity has to show itself worthy, so a donor can get something out of it too.
That’s the way it works.
You are just pissed that Trump tried to give this worthy charity money because you hate Trump. You think that if he was pure of heart he would do it anonymously.
I have news for you: Nobody is pure of heart. Charity gets and the donors get something out of it too.
The charity leader would gladly (I suspect) have accepted money from Bernie Sanders, perhaps even Hillary. He’s just a lefty, and he despises Trump because he is a successful man. Envy is not a good reason to reject a 100k check for a shoe-string charity.
Envy is not a good reason for you to agree with him.