So this Sundance clown opposes state Takings for private benefit right? In the debate Trump said eminent domain should be used to “build factories”. I oppose all Takings for private benefit. You, Trump and Sundance? Not so much.
They're business deals. The buyers offer a higher price than market value. The owners can always say no.
What's the difference between it being a public or private enterprise ? The private enterprise always offers a more generous amount.
The sad part about ED is, that most people don't understand it at all. The propaganda: "OH THE POOR DEFENSELESS WOMAN"...blah, blah...blah!
An a private company isn't going to FORCE someone out; whilst a government entity is far more likely to do just that!
And before you begin some dumb rant at me...YES. MY FAMILY'S PROPERTY, ALLBEIT SEVERAL GENERATIONS AGO, DID SELL THEIR PROPERTY AND MY HEART SWELLS EVERY TIME I SEE OR GO OVER THAT BRIDGE; IT'S MINE!