Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sun

I am not a Rubio supporter, but that is the one thing I like about Rubio as opposed to Trump. He doesn’t support the “exceptions”, realizing that an unborn child is a person regardless of the circumstances of conception.


3 posted on 02/07/2016 2:12:09 PM PST by Pinkbell (Liberal tolerance only extends to people they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pinkbell
Rubio did that "right of the baby" vs "right of the mother" thing which is potentially dangerous ground.

The only right that is truly legitimate is the right of the baby to live. "Right" meaning that which comes from God.

The mother does not have a "right" to terminate the life of her unborn child, because their is no such thing. What we have is a Supreme Court that put it's hands up and allowed women to decide to kill their babies.

Rubio showed that he has no foundational understanding of the word "right."

Therefore, he should not be considered for the presidency nor for VP.

4 posted on 02/07/2016 2:20:16 PM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

I don’t want to start an argument but I am curious what your stance on someone raping a minor who gets pregnant? As far as the minor having a baby. Obviously the person doing the raping should be hung in the middle of the town.

But the person who was raped? What is your opinion on that?


6 posted on 02/07/2016 2:21:58 PM PST by Snark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

“I am not a Rubio supporter, but that is the one thing I like about Rubio as opposed to Trump. He doesn’t support the “exceptions”, realizing that an unborn child is a person regardless of the circumstances of conception.”

Yes, I liked that as well about Rubio, and I’m not supporting him either. But I do like him more than Trump.


9 posted on 02/07/2016 2:25:50 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

And there is a tendency for pregnant rapees to cling to the babies. They feel terribly wronged but do not want to compound the wrong by taking revenge by an innocent third party.


13 posted on 02/07/2016 2:36:56 PM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

I would be for no exception in case of rape, if the victim is given enough money by tax payers to support the un-planned child through 18 years.

In case of mother’s life exception, it would have to be approved by 3 independent doctors.

In case of incest, same conditions as rape (18 years of tax payer subsidy), plus testing to make sure prospective child will not be born with severe deformities, which have a much greater probability for children of incest.


21 posted on 02/07/2016 3:23:38 PM PST by entropy12 (Trump is the only one not bought off by ultra-rich donors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Pinkbell

Rubio did say he would sign a bill with rape/incest exceptions, though. He made that clear at the debate.


31 posted on 02/07/2016 4:06:34 PM PST by mlizzy (America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe/Wade has deformed a great nation. -MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson