Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Slyfox

“Rubio did that “right of the baby” vs “right of the mother” thing which is potentially dangerous ground. ..”

Maybe he wasn’t clear enough for you, or maybe he was clumsy, but that certainly is not enough to not consider Rubio for president.

As I mentioned before, I am NOT a supporter of Rubio, but that would not disqualify him, imo.


14 posted on 02/07/2016 2:37:38 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Sun
I understood EXACTLY what Rubio was saying and he demonstrated that there is much he does not know. And with that there is a danger if he is in the position to make life and death decisions.

To even mention the right of the baby in the same context as the supposed right of a mother to take the life of her unborn child is just asking for manipulation by the pro-aborts.

He does not think things through clearly.

And he is also ripe for manipulation by the GOP establishment who have no use for the life issue.

Marco Rubio is a lightweight who needs propping up.

16 posted on 02/07/2016 2:54:11 PM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson