Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeathBeforeDishonor1

Well it’s probably true that most of these programs are unsustainable (and Ponzi schemes). However, most people bought into them in good faith and paid a good chunk of their earnings towards them. And don’t forget, they did not have a choice. I don’t think they thought of them as milking future generations. These programs were sold as self sustaining (which was a lie but most people do not have the economic background to decipher that).

As they say, it seemed like a good idea at the time.

I’m sure every generation has/will put in place equivalent boondoggles. Why? Because the people at the top of these schemes make a lot of money. Layers and layers of bureaucrats for one thing.

By the way, it wasn’t the Boomers who put in place most of these programs (it was their parent’s generation or even their grandparent’s generation.) However, Boomers are benefitting from them it is true.


64 posted on 02/07/2016 9:03:29 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne
However, most people bought into them in good faith and paid a good chunk of their earnings towards them.

1) We didn't buy into socialist insecurity and the rest of that lot. Money was taken from our paychecks, at gunpoint and without our consent.

2) No good faith was involved. The government has lied about the nature of socialist insecurity and similar programs from the beginning, when Congress first considered them.

3) Yes, a big chunk of our earnings was taken at gunpoint to support these programs, and it has all been spent.

181 posted on 02/08/2016 1:11:01 PM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson