What you say is patently false. I know the case quite well and there is a lot of old factual information on the casae available on the internet that has existed before Trump was ever a candidate.
I have posted the facts and links before, and other FR posters have corroborated them.
He offered the property owner 100% more than any other offer (2 million). After she won her eminent lawsuit against other developers (not Trump), she refused to sell. When she passed away her family put her home on the market for 1 million but received no offers. They eventually sold for much less. It had nothing to do with Trump who was no longer involved in any of the developments in that area.
I just posted the facts and they existed well before he ran for President.
Fact: Guccione offered 1M
FAct: Trump later offered a large amount (presumably about the 2M you state). one of his sons stated it was 1.9M. I don’t doubt that.
Fact: when she refused, he got the CRDA (e.g., his cronies in the local AC government) to send a letter telling her the house was condemned and she was getting 251K for the property
Fact: she did win the case and didn’t wish to sell, that was her decision. It was her property and she should be able to do as she wished with it.
As for telling me what I said was false, you appear to be calling me a liar. Obviously, you don’t know the case as well as you think you do, or you are lying which seems to happen a lot with the Trump supporters when this subject comes up.
I'll bet her heirs are still knocking their heads against the wall that she didn't take the $2 million offered by a more than generous Mr. Trump for that non-descript house of hers surrounded by blaring night clubs and bars.
Thanks for posting the FACTS, Hostage.
Leni