To: mylife
Or it meant well armed.
There is no reason rocket launchers and anti aircraft weapons should not be in the hands of citizens if the 2nd Amendment is for defense of the citizenry when the Army needs help or can’t do it.
I would submit it is not unconstitutional to ban hunting, but is to disallow private ownership of anti-aircraft weapons.
31 posted on
02/06/2016 9:21:51 AM PST by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: ifinnegan
33 posted on
02/06/2016 9:23:00 AM PST by
mylife
To: ifinnegan
Or it meant well armed. There is no reason rocket launchers and anti aircraft weapons should not be in the hands of citizens if the 2nd Amendment is for defense of the citizenry when the Army needs help or canât do it. I would submit it is not unconstitutional to ban hunting, but is to disallow private ownership of anti-aircraft weapons.
So called "assault weapons" are still just small arms. Not sure the Founders wanted to include artillery.
To: ifinnegan
Actually “well regulated” means “efficient/accurate.” The 2nd’s purpose was to insure that those called to National military service were familiar in the use of personal weapons and required little to no rifle training by protecting the populace’s ownership and use of weapons.
Reading the 2nd using that idea in the text clarifies the Founder’s intent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson