Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mylife

Or it meant well armed.

There is no reason rocket launchers and anti aircraft weapons should not be in the hands of citizens if the 2nd Amendment is for defense of the citizenry when the Army needs help or can’t do it.

I would submit it is not unconstitutional to ban hunting, but is to disallow private ownership of anti-aircraft weapons.


31 posted on 02/06/2016 9:21:51 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan

Amen


33 posted on 02/06/2016 9:23:00 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
Or it meant well armed. There is no reason rocket launchers and anti aircraft weapons should not be in the hands of citizens if the 2nd Amendment is for defense of the citizenry when the Army needs help or can’t do it. I would submit it is not unconstitutional to ban hunting, but is to disallow private ownership of anti-aircraft weapons.

So called "assault weapons" are still just small arms. Not sure the Founders wanted to include artillery.
154 posted on 02/08/2016 5:01:12 AM PST by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

Actually “well regulated” means “efficient/accurate.” The 2nd’s purpose was to insure that those called to National military service were familiar in the use of personal weapons and required little to no rifle training by protecting the populace’s ownership and use of weapons.

Reading the 2nd using that idea in the text clarifies the Founder’s intent.


159 posted on 02/08/2016 7:12:38 AM PST by Forty-Niner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson