Posted on 02/05/2016 5:21:09 PM PST by JSDude1
If you call Mark Steyn BS, then you are out of touch.
Actually, our arguing this is evidence that it is a suspect election.
To characterize this as fraud is slander.
current = correct
Sour grapes on Brandstand’s part (especially because he and his family are addicted to Ethanol).
Ben Carson lost maybe 1% (at most).
Turn me in.
Whoever gets your accusation will acknowledge it is a suspect election for both Cruz and Mrs. Clinton.
When the governor of a state says so, then there’s something wrong.
Like I said to another, we wouldn’t be discussing this if it weren’t a suspect election.
I’ll let you live with it instead.
Quite a indictment of the Cruz Campaign. This puts up a real red flag for me on Cruz. Sigh, I like Cruz a lot, hate the tarnish.
Voter Fraud? Come on x. You're better than this.
Self-serving comments by ethanol-crony Branstad. Dude pleaded with Iowans, “Anybody but Cruz!” And the good Republicans of Iowa listened attentively and voted for... Cruz. Unsurprising that he’d try to diminish Ted’s win.
And since you don’t know, that’s what makes it a suspect election.
And the governor of a state is pretty close to activity in his state.
If I were running for governor in that state, I’d note that a suspected 28% of Iowans favored reducing ethanol tax subsidies. That means 72% do NOT favor it. He had not reason at all to think anything about ethanol tax subsidies.
It IS a suspect election.
ROTFL! I know nobody from FR worked there.
They didn’t lie. They passed on a CNN story that has proven to be true. This is Friday night and Carson hasn’t attended a single campaign event since he left Iowa Monday night.
I hope somebody breaks the story about the empty campaign bus that Carson leased to drive around the primary states and make people think he was campaigning. What a sham.
Baloney.
Actually, they didn’t vote for Cruz. Only 28% of republicans voted for Cruz. And even that number is suspect.
The rest of the state voted for ethanol tax subsidies. 72% of the republicans and 100% of the democrats. That governor can add and subtract.
Read #11.
Judge Napolitano said there is no legal basis whatsoever for Trump’s fraud claims against Cruz.
n.b., I qualified it by saying ‘the GOOD Republicans...’
Steyn might be the most insightful, quick mind commenting in our day.
In any case, he’s seen stupid acts of government and its wannabees before. Cruz’s unethical team in Iowa is another of them.
Thank you. It is hard to argue that Cruz didn’t work his heart out to win Iowa.
Carson would have gotten even fewer votes if people knew just how much of a sham his campaign is. Nobody but a complete fraud would lease a campaign bus and have it drive around the primary states empty to make people believe he was campaigning.
Carson hasn’t attended a single campaign event since Monday night. Looks like the CNN report was true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.