Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruling In Maryland’s “Assault Weapons” Case Could Gut Gun Control Nationwide
Bearing Arms ^ | 2/4/16 | Bob Owens

Posted on 02/04/2016 4:19:58 PM PST by patq

In what has to be viewed as a major victory for gun owners, the United States Court of Appeals for 4th Circuit ruled that lower court judge in Kolbe V. Maryland must apply the standard of strict scrutiny in reviewing the case about Maryland’s “assault weapon” ban, duplicitously called the Firearms Safety Act (FSA).

Laws banning “assault weapons” in Maryland and in other states with “anti-gun” legislatures have typically been upheld when lower court judges—almost universally gun-hating activist liberals—have cheated We, The People by applying the much lower standard of intermediate scrutiny. ...

Chris W. Cox, the executive director of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, seems thrilled with the result.

“The Fourth Circuit’s ruling is an important victory for the Second Amendment. Maryland’s ban on commonly owned firearms and magazines clearly violates our fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. The highest level of judicial scrutiny should apply when governments try to restrict our Second Amendment freedoms.”

(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; assaultweapons; banglist; guncontrol; maryland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Congrats to those in Maryland and other gun grabbing states who support the 2nd amendment. This may end up in the Supreme Court after the Friedman case pass by the Supremes. Of course it will takes years.
1 posted on 02/04/2016 4:19:58 PM PST by patq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: patq

I am of the opinion that using strict scrutiny would eliminate magazine limits as well.


2 posted on 02/04/2016 4:23:30 PM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patq

I’m still moving to Texas.


3 posted on 02/04/2016 4:23:37 PM PST by PLMerite (The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patq

Blow the freakin “safe act” Prince Andrew of Gnu Yak is way overreaching..


4 posted on 02/04/2016 4:24:46 PM PST by Shady (We are at war again......this time for our lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patq

Fingers crossed. X


5 posted on 02/04/2016 4:29:57 PM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

Texas gun laws are more restrictive than many other states. We’re working on it, and I don’t want to discourage you from coming, but as far as gun rights, you could do better than Texas.


6 posted on 02/04/2016 4:41:20 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

I think Arizona is number one for gun rights; open carry allowed, no permit required for concealed carry.


7 posted on 02/04/2016 4:43:41 PM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

Of course, we have seen the results: blood running knee deep in Arizona.

Oh wait, that’s Illinois, gun banning Chicago in particular.

Never mind.

BtW Texas is getting better wrt concealed and now open carry.


8 posted on 02/04/2016 4:57:36 PM PST by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

We are the same here in Maine....Open Carry without a permit, Constitutional Carry went into effect in October; no permit required to conceal carry in your car or on your person.

Arizona is far more pleasant weather-wise in the winter, however.


9 posted on 02/04/2016 4:58:29 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Politicians and diapers must be changed often and for the same reason.....Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Nothing could be crazier than New York.


10 posted on 02/04/2016 5:11:05 PM PST by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

>> I’m still moving to Texas.

C’mon! We’ve got lots of room and we welcome Gun Nuts. The nuttier the better! :-)


11 posted on 02/04/2016 5:17:29 PM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: patq

I wouldn’t pop the champagne corks just yet. Just like the favorable 9th Circuit decision on “shall issue” in California, this could be appealed to an en banc review by the entire 4th circuit.


12 posted on 02/04/2016 5:28:26 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Holy smokes, ME has permitless concealed carry before we do? Good on you guys. You all are on a roll...so automatic knives must have passed at the same time.


13 posted on 02/04/2016 5:45:30 PM PST by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Level of scrutiny where a right enumerated in the Constitution is affected, is now required to be Strict scrutiny, not intermediate scrutiny.

Such a law, as the MD and CT recent gun laws, under intermediate scrutiny catch-all phase clauses such as “for public safety” allows every and any law to be ruled as constitutional. Strict scrutiny requires that there be the naming of specific plaintiffs and defendants of injured parties because of a law existing or because the law did not exist before. “Because I said so and because it feels good” no longer holds up in a court of law.


14 posted on 02/04/2016 5:46:12 PM PST by USCG SimTech (Honored to serve since '71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: patq
 photo image_zpskbdnhvns.jpeg
15 posted on 02/04/2016 6:02:36 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


16 posted on 02/04/2016 6:15:57 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patq

Great news. Maybe Governor Hogan and the few republicans in the General Asylum will pounce on this and ratchet it up a few notches.

Let freedom ring


17 posted on 02/04/2016 6:20:20 PM PST by cyclotic (Liberalism is what smart looks like to stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyclotic

Doubt it.

Larry has said he isn’t going to do anything about O’Malley’s gun laws.


18 posted on 02/04/2016 6:26:47 PM PST by sauropod (I am His and He is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
I just wanna get one of these that aren't legal in Maryland any more:

Springfield Armory SOCOM 16

19 posted on 02/04/2016 7:19:06 PM PST by PLMerite (The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

Arizona and Alaska best.


20 posted on 02/04/2016 7:20:55 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson