Posted on 02/04/2016 4:50:36 AM PST by Enlightened1
The "Kid" was all to eager to be a part of the Washington Establishment, I'd never trust him.
'Kid' Rubio.
But I agree with you that he's unacceptable for the reasons you list. Furthermore, he seems like the most sleazy, scripted, and fake candidate of the GOP pack.
Sadly it's true. Unless they can put their oversized egos aside, we'll be stuck with a Clinton-style conman as the GOP nominee. It's amazing that this political flim-flam man managed to fool Tea Partiers into thinking that he was one of theirs.
Pretty accusing with the ‘liar’ thing. Anchor also connotes an anchor from which to extend legitimacy by US birth for foreign relatives not in the immediate family.
+1
So my two sons who were born in Germany while I was stationed there in service are not citizens?
Maybe you should meet my oldest son to discuss it with him when he gets back stateside or maybe you can meet him at port in the Gulf of Oman.
Exactly!
Remember Rush liked Karl Rove too. Rush told us W was a conservative.
Rush told us if we elect Republicans in congress they would stop Obama and Obamacare.
I would not listen to Rush on who to get behind because in most instances it does not work.
Do you know where his older sister Barbara was born?
First tell me why I should care. Is she running for something? Why does this matter? I’m not trying to undercut you but I want to know why this is relevant? Thanks.
If his older sister was born here in the U.S., that would give her the possible label of ‘anchor baby’, not him.
Then that’s what you should have said from the outset. I’m not here for gotchas and tricks.
“Pretty accusing with the ‘liar’ thing. Anchor also connotes an anchor from which to extend legitimacy by US birth for foreign relatives not in the immediate family.”
Anchor also means the huge metal hook dropped from the ships. But, the context was clearly ANCHOR BABY, which the guy clearly accused roobio of being. How was Roobio an anchor baby? I asked the guy and his reply was clearly a lie. Do you disagree?
I questioned your blanket statement. Boat anchor
Is irrelevant.
You injected yourself into the exchange between me and the other guy. Our topic was clearly BABY Anchor. You started talking about anchors. I was making a point about changing the context, which you did.
Now, back to the topic of BABY anchors. Any disagreements?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.