Replies

"I think you will have to come up with more than that to defeat the revealed substance of what is going on here. There was not a record turnout in Iowa - exceeding Obama's 2008 record - because of this meaningless conflict. There was a record turnout for conservatism because Cruz has done the hard work of running a ground campaign for months in Iowa. Carson and Trump think they can take casual shots from the sidelines of politics and denounce any practical efforts at gaining votes on the ground as unethical."

This is the one thing that assures me that Trump will win, because Cruz is supported by a special brand of dumbass like you.

RON PAUL finished third in the 2012 Iowa GOP caucuses but walked away with the top-winning 22 delegates!:

C'mon give me some panic you Zevangelical doormat! LOL. < whip crack > Yaah yaah! C'mon mule!

Well you are a wealth of useless trivia.

I guess the most interesting point to derive from your 2012 data is that Cruz garnered over 50,000 votes.

That is extraordinary and ought to be celebrated by conservatives.

That has nothing to do with this tempest in the Teapot regarding poor Ben Carson.

We now know that Trump lied when he congratulated Ted Cruz on Monday night. Trump is fundamentally insincere.

Rand Paul dropped out today so maybe your bitterness has been enhanced by that fact.

It is worth nothing— though your analysis offers very few clues— that unlike 2012 it appears the establishment is dead in this race. There is no Romney waiting in the wings to clear the decks. Jeb Bush is in a far more desperate spot.

I do think Trump can come back and certainly take the lead but he is behaving pathetically. He clearly did not garner a surge in the last week due to his petulance before the debate and I doubt this current bout is helping him further in NH.

If Trump is counting on great intellectual advocates like yourself . . . I like my chances.