Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A-10 Warthog Retirement Delayed for Six Years
KGUN9 ^ | February 2, 2016 | KGUN9

Posted on 02/03/2016 10:51:53 AM PST by DogByte6RER

a-10 warthog photo: A10 A-1020Thunderbolt20120-201024x768.jpg

A-10 retirement delayed for six years

There is good news for Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. The Air Force will not retire A-10s until the year 2022.

Tuesday Secretary of Defense Ash Carter said the A-10 has been such a powerful tool in the fight against ISIS that plans to retire the warplane are on hold for another six years. That's what a lot of Southern Arizona was hoping to hear. The A-10 is a huge part of the local economy.

More life for the A-10 is good news for the local economy but bad news for ISIS.

The plane is built around a huge gun meant to slice open tanks so to an A-10 almost anything else is a soft target.

Troops on the ground love the plane because it can fly low and slow enough to tell good guys from bad, and make sure bad guys have a bad day.

As a former A-10 pilot and Squadron commander Congresswoman Martha Mc Sally has been fighting to keep the A-10 in the air. She's looking past the A-10s new 2022 retirement date---just six years away.

"And I've been advocating that until we have a suitable, proven replacement to keep our troops safe that we need to keep the Warthog flying and I'm going to continue to lead that fight."

(Excerpt) Read more at kgun9.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: a10; military; usaf; warthog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Blood of Tyrants

The process of re-opening the production line would be as expensive as developing a new plane - the dies, etc. have all been scrapped.

And we CAN improve it on it - better thrust to weight, more PGMs, better all-weather capabilities, etc.

But, truth is, we might need to downgrade - we don’t need super tankbuster as much these days, as we do flying tractors ready to dump PGMs on target when called for. Quantity might be better than quality for most applications right now.


61 posted on 02/03/2016 12:35:49 PM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: laplata

And the IDF.


62 posted on 02/03/2016 12:40:35 PM PST by mcshot (The "Greatest Generation" would never have allowed the trashing of our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

The air force would rather keep it then let the Army have a fixed wing.


Then Air Force Brass shouldn’t bitch and moan about having it.


63 posted on 02/03/2016 12:45:18 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Hell yes!


64 posted on 02/03/2016 12:45:41 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

It’s not “sad”. Nothing better has been conceived to replace it.

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.


65 posted on 02/03/2016 12:48:46 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mcshot

And the IDF.

Absolutely!


66 posted on 02/03/2016 12:49:31 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Eventually, the wings will fall off. Until then, keep flying ‘em ... and build a bonafide replacement.


67 posted on 02/03/2016 12:50:20 PM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

This will go over Obama’s head, but it should make sense to anyone who has ever worn the uniform.

1. The A-10 is a phenomenally effective aircraft for its vital combat mission.

2. The A-10 should remain operational until the Air Force has something at least as good to take over that mission.

As pretty as stealth aircraft are, and as fun as air-to-air combat jets can be, it’s boots on the ground who take and hold territory. We need aircraft that support those troops, and the A-10 is the best for that mission.


68 posted on 02/03/2016 12:51:41 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
USAF and aerospace manufacturers can’t come up with an effective replacement.

Can't??? Bullshit.

Try "aren't allowed to". The politics surrounding defense acquisition are absolutely disgusting.

69 posted on 02/03/2016 12:53:08 PM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

The Marine Corps has fixed wings that specialize in ground support...give them to the Corps....can the A-10 be launched from a carrier?


70 posted on 02/03/2016 1:06:30 PM PST by major_gaff (University of Parris Island, Class of '84)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
The A-10 is the most effective CAS asset in the USAF inventory, the cheapest to run, highest availability, and most survivable attack plane — and some of the USAF fighter mafia think the F-35 can replace it? For the price of one F-35, you could run the whole A-10 fleet for years! Warthogs forever!
71 posted on 02/03/2016 1:10:07 PM PST by MasterGunner01 ( Barbara Da)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata

That’s what gets rained on the BAD GUY by the A10: Holy HELL.


72 posted on 02/03/2016 1:10:39 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Yep!


73 posted on 02/03/2016 1:12:23 PM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: central_va

You are right. Fairchild in Hagerstown. Who knows who bought them up? Engine by GE.


74 posted on 02/03/2016 1:14:53 PM PST by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: major_gaff

Launched from a carrier, yes.

But not recovered aboard.


75 posted on 02/03/2016 1:14:53 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

I thought the name looked familiar. She also brought up the lawsuit that made the military stop forcing American women to wear the religous garb in the ME.


76 posted on 02/03/2016 1:16:50 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Boeing rebuilt the tooling for making the wings a few years back. And there are PLENTY of low-hours fuselages sitting at AMARG. No need to reopen the entire line, what we have would support a good sized active fleet for the next 50 years.


77 posted on 02/03/2016 1:17:13 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Heck, I can come up with an idea for one right now.
For instance, replace the gun with a submunition dispenser. being able to drop multiple precision guided munitions (PGM) might be a good replacement for the gun. You could carry a lot of 25 lb. bomblets for the weight of the gun and ammo.


78 posted on 02/03/2016 1:17:53 PM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Covenantor
Actually, the first .50 caliber Browning machine gun was the M1921. The M2 variant (standardized 1933) was a redesign of the original and has been in production ever since. The .50 caliber Browning will celebrate its 100th anniversary in 2021 and it shows no sign of retirement.
79 posted on 02/03/2016 1:18:45 PM PST by MasterGunner01 ( Barbara Da)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
If you took away their ordnance, the USAF would be just a very expensive flying club.
80 posted on 02/03/2016 1:20:38 PM PST by MasterGunner01 ( Barbara Da)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson