Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jan_Sobieski

Females had a chance to stand up and say that they didn’t want females in the Combat Arms.

The silence from females on this issue was deafening.

Females didn’t care, because they didn’t have to care. Only males have to worry about being involuntarily assigned to Combat Arms units containing females.

That’s why females care so little about the Defense Budget. They don’t see any benefit for them in an adequate Defense Budget. It is only men who can be forced to serve. Females don’t care if tanks are made out of paper mâché because they can’t be forced to ride in them.

Females had their opportunity to stand up and say that they didn’t want females in the Combat Arms, but they didn’t care enough to pay attention.

Welcome to the Infantry, ladies!


37 posted on 02/03/2016 11:08:15 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6
Most women have no clue what it actually means to serve in the combat arms. Heck, most men who haven't served (including our President) have no clue.

So, it is the obligation of veterans and our elected leaders to educate people on this issue -- to stand up and scream from the heavens when something stupid like this is about to happen. By linking women in combat MOS's with draft registration, these two generals have given us that wedge issue to get peoples' attention.

The old "well, you wanted it, you got it" routine can be satisfying. The problem is that ones who pay the price -- perhaps even with their lives -- are those who still serve in those combat MOS's.

We owe it to them to keep this fight going.

42 posted on 02/03/2016 11:15:14 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson