[Leo Carpathian]

IRREFUTABLE AUTHORITY HAS SPOKEN
(Oct. 18, 2009) The Post & Email has in several articles mentioned that the Supreme Court of the United States has given the definition of what a “natural born citizen” is. Since being a natural born citizen is an objective qualification and requirement of office for the U.S. President (and VP), it is important for all U.S. Citizens to understand what this term means.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/18/4-supreme-court-cases-define-natural-born-citizen/

[patlin]

That article by the Post & Email is hardly irrefutable as it fails to bring the one fact, the ONE legal litmus test by which one is either natural born or naturalized and that is “expatriation”. Did or did not the child at birth, have a foreign nationality they would have to renounce upon their coming of age.

It just irks me when these pundits claim that their conclusions are irrefutable, when in fact, they are very much refutable.