The noose is tightening.
Lol. that’s got to suck.
I’d love to see that whole bunch cuffed and stuffed.
Since when does the FBI have the power to take testimony under oath?
underwear browner ?
how 'bout some bleach for that !
Wonder which one is getting ready to take the fall ? I’m betting on Cheryl. She takes 100% blame...
He too believed that if he was going down everyone else would suffer.
Huma Abedin: I decline to testify, on the grounds it might tend to incriminate me.
Cheryl Mills: I decline to testify, on the grounds it might tend to incriminate me.
Jake Sullivan: I decline to testify, on the grounds it might tend to incriminate me.
FBI: Would anyone like immunity in exchange for testimony against Hillary Clinton?
Abendin, Mills, Sullivan: Me, me, me!
Worse case; These three go to the pokey and HRC remains unscathed.
My SELECTIVE reading gave me -—$3.00 Trick— it does fit into the story.
I want to know more about the $3 teeth whitening trick!
“They are Hillary’s closest and most important advisers. They are the people she shares her deepest darkest secrets with.”
And they will gladly.. even eagerly .. take the fall for her. The Clintons are very masterful at staffing their inner circle with people who are willing to give up their freedom, and if necessary their lives, for them. Their loyalty to the Clintons is total.
One of these three is the fall guy/gal.
They have already got it planned out.
Somebody had to be sacrificed after all the revelations.
One time offer of immunity for spilling the truth about how Hillary told her surrogates to remove classified markings and forward the information to her home server in violation of security procedures and U.S. Law....
Add two more Hillary excuses/alibis from the last week.
1. Its just another thing to throw against the wall to see if it sticks.
2. I dont recall.
3. At this point, what does it matter?
4. We didnt do anything wrong
5. We didnt know we were doing anything wrong
6. You cant prove we knew we were doing anything wrong.
7. Theres no evidence of any wrongdoing.
8. Thats old news. It’s all been gone over in the last few weeks/ months/ years.
9. I would never do that.
10. Nobody does that
11. Everybody does that.
12. Ah hah hah hahahahaha
13. It was all a mistake/misunderstanding.
14. This is very much like Benghazi. Its just a hit job.
15. They’re just grasping at straws.
And all of this is still going on because CONGRESS REFUSES TO DO THEIR JOB, I would bet my last Nickel that the Secret Senate Intelligence has known about all of this since the beginning.
Congress has ALL the power in washington, the executive and judicial branch operate according to the whims of CONGRESS!
Congress can Remove the President
Congress can remove the head of every executive agency Congress can remove ALL of their employees
Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
Congress can declare WAR
No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!
CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!
Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)
If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.
Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.
Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.
Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.
Some references
[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html
[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.†http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html
[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit
[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html
[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf
[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/
From what I understand so far, the FBI has not been given the authority to offer immunity to anyone in exchange for information. This is usually a mere formality, but not in this case. If they are unable to get someone to flip,all of the principles will simply just take the 5th.
FYI
HUGH.
SERIES.