Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plans For Hidden IT Network To Help Clinton Skirt Rules Uncovered by Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch ^ | February 1, 2016

Posted on 02/02/2016 9:00:15 AM PST by jazusamo

'We should ... set up a stand-alone PC in the Secretary's office, connected to the internet (but not through our system) to enable her to check her emails from her desk'

(Washington, DC) - Judicial Watch announced today that it recently received records from the Department of State disclosing plans by senior State Department officials to set up a "stand-alone PC" so that Clinton could check her emails in an office "across the hall" through a separate, non-State Department computer network system. Referencing the special Clinton computer system, Under Secretary for Management Patrick F. Kennedy, writes Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, "The stand-alone separate network PC is a great idea." The emails are from January 23-24, 2009, a few days after Clinton was sworn in as Secretary of State.

The new emails were obtained by Judicial Watch in response a court order in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for State Department records about Hillary Clinton's separate email system ( Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00689)).

In the email chain, Lewis Lukens , former deputy assistant secretary of state and executive director of the secretariat, responds to a request from Mills by informing her, top Clinton aide Huma Abedin, and Kennedy that the new personal computer "in the secretary's office" would be "connected to the internet (but not through our system)." Abedin responds, "We are hoping for that if possible."

The email exchange discussing plans to provide Clinton a separate computer to skirt the internal State Department computer network begins with a message from Mills to Lukens in which she requests Clinton being able to access her emails through "a non-DOS computer." The email discusses how the stand-alone computer can be set up and why it is "a great idea' and "the best solution:"

From: Cheryl Mills
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:45 AM
To: Lukens, Lewis A
Subject: Re: Series of questions

Lew - who can I talk to about:

  1. Can our email be accessed remotely through the web using a non-DOS computer like my laptop?
  2. I am traveling to the M-E - will my DOS bb work there and is there a cell phone attached?
  3. Spoke to Dan [Daniel B. Smith, former DOS executive secretary] re: bb for HRC (and reports that POTUS is able to use a super encrypted one which)
  4. Spoke to Dan re: setting up Counselor office for HRC so she can go across hall regularly to check her email

***

From: Lukens, Lewis A
To: cmills [REDACTED]
Cc: Habedin [REDACTED]; Kennedy, Patrick F; Smith, Daniel B
Sent: Saturday, Jan. 24, 19:10:33 2009
Subject: Re: series of questions

We have already started checking into the NSA bb. Will set up the office across the hall as requested. Also, I think we should go ahead (but will await your green light) and set up a stand-alone PC in the Secretary's office, connect to the internet (but not through our system) to enable her to check her emails from her desk. Lew.

From: Kennedy, Patrick F KennedyPF@state.gov
To: Lukens, Lewis A ; Cheryl Mills
Cc: Huma Abedin; Smith, Daniel B
Sent: Sat, Jan 24 19:48:25 2009
Subject: Re: Series of questions

Cheryl

The stand-alone separate network PC is [a] great idea

Regards

Pat

From: Huma Abedin
To: Kennedy, Patrick F; Lukens, Lewis A; Cheryl Mills
Cc: Huma Abedin; Smith, Daniel B
Sent: Sat Jan 24 19:48:27 2009
Subject: Re: Series of questions

Yes we were hoping for that if possible so she can check her email in her office.

***

From: Lukens, Lewis A
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 8:26 PM
To: Kennedy, Patrick F
Subject: Re: Series of questions

I talked to Cheryl about this. She says a problem is hrc does not know how to use a computer to do email - only bb [Blackberry]. But, I said would not take much training to get her up to speed.

In separate litigation , the State Department told Judicial Watch and federal courts that Hillary Clinton was never issued secure State Department computing devices.

"These emails are shocking. They show the Obama State Department's plan to set up non-government computers and a computer network for Hillary Clinton to bypass the State Department network," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "That these records were withheld from the American people until now is scandalous and shows the criminal probe of Hillary Clinton's email system should include current and former officials of the Obama administration."

Judicial Watch filed these new emails with U.S. District Court Judge Emmett Sullivan, who is now considering whether to grant discovery in a lawsuit seeking information on the "special government employee" status of Abedin. In its filing, Judicial Watch states:

[Judicial Watch] just recently received additional evidence that demonstrates that senior management at the State Department was well aware that Mrs. Clinton was using a "non-state.gov" system to conduct official government business. This evidence also shows that the senior management at the State Department knowingly aided Mrs. Clinton in establishing and using a "non-state.gov" system.

***

[T]his newly discovered email demonstrates that there is at least a "reasonable suspicion" that the State Department and Mrs. Clinton deliberately thwarted FOIA by creating, using, and concealing the "clintonemail.com" record system for six years.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200901; 20090123; 20090124; alewis; cherylmills; clinton; emails; foia; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemails; hillaryemailserver; huma; humaabedin; jw; lewislukens; llukens; lukens; nongovemails; opacity; patrickkennedy; privatecomputer; secrecy; skirtingrules; statedepartment; transparency
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2016 9:00:15 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Beautiful.. Just frigging beautiful.

So Mills gets a “Get Into Jail For Free” card.
And, of course, Hillary skates.


2 posted on 02/02/2016 9:02:41 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Wasn’t this “stand-alone” PC just about what they got?

Once again, Herself was aboard a plane dodging incoming fire, corkscrewing its way down for a landing, and Herself was ducking sniper fire all the way to the terminal.


3 posted on 02/02/2016 9:07:33 AM PST by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Could be because the “smartest woman in the world” didn’t know a thing about computers or rules.


4 posted on 02/02/2016 9:08:41 AM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Why would she have a separate server anyway? Is she sharing classified information with Sid Blumenthal and others who aren’t authorized to receive it?


5 posted on 02/02/2016 9:08:47 AM PST by Gunpowder green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I want to see what happens with this coin toss garbage. Hitlery miraculously beats 1 - 64 odds. Oh nothing to see here, just accept it. Reminds me when she was running for Satanor of New York and she was getting 100% votes in different districts. Oh nothing to see here.


6 posted on 02/02/2016 9:10:54 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I’ll take Mills, Huma, and Kennedy, oh and Sid Vicious in PRISON.....Hillary will NEVER go, but these criminals just MIGHT!


7 posted on 02/02/2016 9:11:35 AM PST by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gunpowder green

I pray the FBI found the answer to that as a “Yes.”


8 posted on 02/02/2016 9:12:13 AM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

A DOS PC are you kidding? This is the Onion, right?


9 posted on 02/02/2016 9:12:34 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

WTF is the coin toss fiasco?? Can you explain?


10 posted on 02/02/2016 9:12:44 AM PST by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

11 posted on 02/02/2016 9:14:09 AM PST by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Bkmrk


12 posted on 02/02/2016 9:14:11 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

13 posted on 02/02/2016 9:16:08 AM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I remember a quaint little saying that went something like this:

“No justice, no peace”.


14 posted on 02/02/2016 9:17:01 AM PST by Dogbert41 (All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Eh, Judicial Watch making a mountain out of a molehill on this one.

There’s nothing wrong with setting up a computer to access the outside internet for personal email, web browsing (within acceptable “safe for work” guidelines), etc. - especially if said computer is not connecting to the state department network.

That is, such a system is intended for personal, non-governmental use, and it’s reasonably routine.

The problem in this case is that we NOW know that Clinton and others were conducting government business, not personal use, on these computers. But looking at the request at the time it was made, it would have been perfectly reasonable to provide this arrangement for nominally personal use.


15 posted on 02/02/2016 9:18:12 AM PST by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Ping


16 posted on 02/02/2016 9:20:16 AM PST by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Dept of State


17 posted on 02/02/2016 9:21:14 AM PST by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
WTF is the coin toss fiasco?? Can you explain?

Six delegates from Iowa - out of some 36 total! - could not be decided in the “live voter meetings” called caucuses. Sanders was leading in delegate count without these 6 delegates to the national democrat convention.

The “democrat party” officials flipped a coin six times to see who would get which delegates in the tie.

And Hillary won the coin toss 6 times out of 6 tosses.

18 posted on 02/02/2016 9:23:58 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PIF

DOS - Dept of State


19 posted on 02/02/2016 9:25:20 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If they pulled this off without anyone going to their respective Inspector General, I’d be amazed. If they did go to the their IG and got blown off, it’s even worse.

A whole lot of people had to know about this, even if they didn’t object, and they should have.


20 posted on 02/02/2016 9:25:45 AM PST by PLMerite (The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson