Posted on 02/01/2016 6:37:19 AM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
The police are specifically NOT enforcing their laws here. The gangs take over the streets and rape at will... and the police delete the CCTV tapes of the rapes.... and you defend it.
She’d clean up just fine. And that is a point too. I hope they rediscover family, confidence and commitment, and start making more French boys and girls. No children means no future.
Are you going to Stockholm? What does our daughter say? Has she noticed the changes? I think you’ll be fine. Just watch your wallet, purses, etc. especially in busy areas. I use one of those things you wrap around your neck and keep my credit card, passport and cash in that.
I don't think you really get this American Constitution thing. Read up on "negative rights" and get back to me. I prefer you having absolutely zero say in what my rights are, and that goes for the rest of your collective, too. In America, the Constitution restricts the government, not the other way around. It's not an easy concept for Leftists, but you can get it if you try.
There's some "intellectual rigor" for you.
I hope they rediscover family, confidence and commitment, and start making more French boys and girls.
**
Inside a marriage.
Let’s hope they find the faith of their forefathers.
My doctorate's in molecular collision theory. And yours?
wtf, new world order bs...looks like it was their plan.Islam will kill them..head in sand does not make things better..
yea all gangstamints have been bought because they know the world economy is a lie and a shell game and based on total bs. The world economy has died, they are getting ready with the body bags..
when hard work to produce a quality item is the least valued comodity then society is least valued and is falling apart.
western governments must declare Islam a violent form of government which must be banned to continue on.
You'd never know it from your arguments on this thread.
So from that I take it you look to the Constitution. Positive or negative, there's a process laid out there to determine if rights, pre-existing or not, are being abridged as well as a process to determine remedies.
As you point, out it's possible to codify negative rights.
No, what I pointed out is that the codification of rights is their rejection and replacement with government granted privileges.
Your words make no sense, and your attempt to project your confusion onto me is pathetic. As I said, study the subject of negative rights. At least get a clue about the subject matter before you try to insult me with your twisting of it.
I know that's your view, but whether right or privilege, negative or positive, in every country I can think of those rights/privileges are protected (or not) by the laws and the government.
In the real world a right that you can't enforce or protect doesn't exist.
Out for tonight.
No country in the world is based on the doctrine of negative rights except the United States of America. As a result, no other people in the whole world have rights - only privileges. That's not my "view," it's a fact many Americans have died to protect throughout American history. It's the fundamental reason for the very existence of this country. For a FReeper, your ignorance is appalling.
If a government refuses to perform its most important function, protect its people, the people will be forced to do it themselves.
Let the civil war begin.
Berserker
The lessons are reportedly severe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.