To: wbarmy
Ann Coulter was against Roberts at the time (2005):
" But unfortunately, other than that that, we don't know much about John Roberts. Stealth nominees have never turned out to be a pleasant surprise for conservatives. Never. Not ever. "
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2005-07-20.html
I did not trust the guy then either, but have no proof except my own memory.
10 posted on
02/01/2016 2:44:05 AM PST by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: PghBaldy
Was that before or after Ann said Romney was The guy to have?
15 posted on
02/01/2016 2:55:04 AM PST by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: PghBaldy
I did not trust the guy then either, but have no proof except my own memory.
That is an incredible statement. Why did you not trust him then? What possible writing or decision or aspect of his career made you not trust him? Coulter says it was because she did not have enough information. But he answered all the questions in the Senate confirmation hearings just as any conservative would have wanted.
What made you different?
27 posted on
02/01/2016 3:23:28 AM PST by
wbarmy
(I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson