Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk

The only fly in the ointment is FBI Director James Comey who could recommend a criminal indictment against Hillary. The evidence is overwhelming that he should, but will the FBI meet this titanic test of integrity and the Rule of Law or will the Clintons once again elude accountability for their actions? If the FBI fails the test, then the veil will be lifted on the extent of the corruption and rot that permeates the highest levels of our government, including the career bureaucracy.


48 posted on 01/30/2016 8:53:31 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

Don’t you believe we’re already there? Have been for decades.

Oh how I wish I could be a fly on a wall, hear all this lying and deceiving that goes on and everyone knows it but no one will tackle it.


56 posted on 01/30/2016 9:15:14 AM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

Until we see differently the FBI deserves the benefit of the doubt. If their desire was to cover this up why are they assigning more agents to the investigation and why did they open a second investigation into public corruption or “pay to play”?

Many people seem to be missing the obvious conclusion that you do not assign more investigators to an investigation that is going nowhere. The FBI is an agency who has historically and statutorily protected our nations secrets - it is one of their primary missions and they take it very seriously. I would be shocked if they do not recommend a long list of charges related to this investigation.

I am very interested in the second corruption investigation - that one seems far more complicated, but I would assume they have all the foundation emails and I am sure they have pulled many more emails off the state servers to see which ones correspond to donations at the Clinton foundation. That investigation would probably involve lots of Grand Jury activity (testimony/interviews and documents) and it would take far more time.

They would have to establish that “entity A” wanted something favorable from the State Dept and that favorable treatment corresponded to a donation to the Clinton foundation so you would likely have the left-hand (Clinton server) talking with “entity A” and at some point that would cross to the right-hand (State server) in the form of directives and favorable action. The go-between would obviously be Hillary’s inner circle. This would then be backed up by financial records of donations and likely subpoenaed emails within “entity A.” This investigation would be very complex and could take some time. The alleged assignment of many more agents is not indicative of an investigation going nowhere and public corruption is another primary mission of the FBI.

They won’t control charging, but I will be shocked if they don’t recommend charges for the classified material, that one seems to be obvious. The second investigation is far more complex. I don’t believe the politics will be within the FBI as so many seem to believe - it will be with those who actually charge or not charge (Attorney General). One has to think among the “pay to play” possibilities that there will be a few that are obvious. There has been speculation for years about favorable treatment from State matching donations to the Clinton foundation.

Just my personal speculation and thoughts.


61 posted on 01/30/2016 9:37:03 AM PST by volunbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson